Galaxy A54 Vs iPhone 16

Galaxy A54
Galaxy A54
Starting at

Refurbished price:£119.00

Versus £499.00 new

See options
iPhone 16
iPhone 16
Starting at

Refurbished price:£484.00

Versus £699.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A54, released in March 2023, and the Apple iPhone 16, launched in September 2024, represent distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. While the Galaxy A54 operates within the Android ecosystem, offering extensive customization, the iPhone 16 runs on Apple's iOS, known for its integrated services and user experience. Key differentiators include their operating systems, display technologies, and camera philosophies, catering to different user preferences.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of a smartphone, factors such as software support, physical resilience, and repairability are important.

  • Software Longevity: The Samsung Galaxy A54, launched in March 2023, originally ran Android 13 and has since been updated to Android 16 with One UI 8.0 [1]. Samsung typically provides several years of major OS updates and security patches for its A-series devices. The iPhone 16, released in September 2024 with iOS 18, benefits from Apple's reputation for extended software support, often receiving major iOS updates for five to six years or more from its release date [2, 25]. This generally means the iPhone 16 will receive software updates for a longer period than the Galaxy A54.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A54 features Gorilla Glass 5 on both its front and back, paired with a plastic frame, and carries an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, allowing submersion up to 1 meter for 30 minutes [1, 10]. The iPhone 16 incorporates Apple's Ceramic Shield on the front, a glass back, and an aluminum frame, boasting an IP68 rating, which permits submersion up to 6 meters for 30 minutes [2, 8, 16, 27]. The Ceramic Shield on the iPhone 16 has shown improved scratch resistance in tests [8, 13, 44].
  • Repairability Aspects: Both devices are designed with modern smartphone construction, which can make user-level repairs challenging. However, the iPhone 16 Plus, which shares many design elements with the base iPhone 16, has been noted for potentially easier repairability due to a new electrically de-bonding adhesive under the battery [13, 44].

Year of Release

2023

2024

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of these devices is influenced by their internal components and how they handle various tasks, from everyday browsing to more demanding applications.

  • Processing Capabilities: The Samsung Galaxy A54 is powered by an Exynos 1380 processor, which provides a responsive experience for daily tasks, app navigation, and moderate gaming [1, 32]. It offers a noticeable improvement over its predecessor, ensuring smooth operation for most users [3]. The iPhone 16 features Apple's A18 chip, which delivers a significant leap in performance and efficiency, making it well-suited for demanding applications, advanced gaming, and complex multitasking [2, 15, 16].
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Galaxy A54 comes with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and offers 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, which is expandable via a microSD card up to 1TB [1, 10, 14]. This expandable storage is a notable advantage for users who require extensive local storage for media and files. The iPhone 16 is equipped with 8GB of RAM and comes with 128GB, 256GB, or 512GB of non-expandable NVMe storage [2, 16, 27].
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A54 houses a 5000 mAh battery, generally providing a full day of use for most users, with some tests showing over 10 hours of web browsing on a single charge [3, 24]. The iPhone 16, with a 13.84 Wh (3561 mAh) battery, also offers improved battery life compared to its predecessor, often lasting a full day with typical usage, and around 12 hours and 43 minutes in web browsing tests [2, 17, 22, 27, 35].

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on a smartphone is largely defined by its display, encompassing technology, resolution, and responsiveness.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Samsung Galaxy A54 features a 6.4-inch Super AMOLED display, known for its vibrant colors and deep blacks [1, 10, 19]. The iPhone 16 comes with a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display, which also offers rich colors and excellent contrast [2, 4, 16, 20, 27, 41]. The A54 provides a slightly larger screen area for content consumption.
  • Resolution and Brightness: The Galaxy A54 has a resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, resulting in approximately 403 pixels per inch (ppi) [10, 29]. It can reach up to 1000 nits of brightness in High Brightness Mode (HBM) [29]. The iPhone 16 offers a higher resolution of 2556 x 1179 pixels, translating to about 460 ppi, and boasts a typical maximum brightness of 1000 nits, with a peak outdoor brightness of 2000 nits, enhancing visibility in bright conditions [2, 4, 20, 27, 41].
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: A key difference lies in the refresh rate. The Galaxy A54 features a 120Hz refresh rate, providing smoother scrolling and more fluid animations [1, 3, 10]. In contrast, the iPhone 16 maintains a 60Hz refresh rate, which some users might find less fluid compared to higher refresh rate displays [2, 4, 16, 30].

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1179 x 2556

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Super Retina XDR OLED

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer capable camera systems designed to capture a variety of moments, though they approach imaging with different strengths.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Samsung Galaxy A54 is equipped with a triple-camera setup on the rear, including a 50-megapixel main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 12-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 5-megapixel macro lens [1, 5, 14]. It is noted for its improved main camera performance, particularly in low-light conditions [3]. The iPhone 16 features a dual-camera system with a 48-megapixel main camera that includes sensor-shift OIS and supports super-high-resolution photos (24MP and 48MP), alongside a 12-megapixel ultrawide camera with a 120-degree field of view [2, 12, 16, 21, 27]. The iPhone 16 also introduces a new vertical camera layout and a Camera Control button for quick access to camera features [4, 30, 38].
  • Photography and Video Features: The Galaxy A54 can record videos up to 4K at 30 frames per second (fps) [1]. The iPhone 16 supports video recording up to 4K at 60fps with Dolby Vision HDR, and includes features like Cinematic mode and Action mode [21, 27]. The iPhone 16 also offers macro photography capabilities using its ultrawide lens and improved Photographic Styles for varied looks [16, 30, 36, 38].
  • Front-Facing Camera and Audio: For selfies, the Galaxy A54 has a 32-megapixel front camera [1]. The iPhone 16 features a 12-megapixel front-facing camera [12, 27]. Both devices offer stereo speakers for media consumption [5, 27].

Main camera

50 megapixels

48 megapixels

Front camera

32 megapixels

12 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and daily convenience of these devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy A54 and iPhone 16 support 5G connectivity for faster mobile data speeds [1, 2, 14, 27]. The Galaxy A54 includes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and Bluetooth v5.3, along with a USB-C 2.0 port [1, 14]. The iPhone 16 steps up to Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3, and also features a USB-C 2.0 port with DisplayPort capabilities [2, 16, 27]. Neither device includes a 3.5mm headphone jack [10, 27].
  • Biometric Security and Navigation: The Galaxy A54 utilizes an optical under-display fingerprint scanner for secure unlocking [1]. The iPhone 16 relies on Face ID for biometric authentication, which uses a TrueDepth camera system [4, 27]. Both phones include NFC for mobile payments [14, 27].
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A54 measures 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm and weighs 202 grams [1, 10]. It features a glass front and back with a plastic frame [1]. The iPhone 16 is more compact and lighter at 147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8 mm and 170 grams, with a Ceramic Shield front, glass back, and aluminum frame [2, 27]. The iPhone 16 also introduces a customizable Action button and a dedicated Camera Control button [4, 25, 30].

Weight

202 g

170 g

Screen size (in)

6.4

6.1

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C (USB 2)

The Samsung Galaxy A54 and the iPhone 16 cater to different user priorities, each excelling in specific areas. Users often praise the Galaxy A54 for its vibrant 120Hz AMOLED display, robust battery life, and the flexibility of expandable storage, which is a significant advantage for those who need ample space for media and documents [3, 32]. Its camera system is also well-regarded for its performance, especially in low-light conditions [3]. However, some users have noted its performance gains as modest compared to its predecessor and the presence of noticeable bezels [3, 32].

The iPhone 16, on the other hand, receives acclaim for its powerful A18 chip, delivering smooth and efficient performance across demanding applications and games [2, 15]. Its advanced camera system, with features like the Camera Control button and improved Photographic Styles, is a strong point for photography enthusiasts [4, 38]. The iPhone 16's enhanced durability with Ceramic Shield and its extended software support are also frequently highlighted as benefits [8, 13]. Criticisms often center on the retention of a 60Hz display refresh rate, which can feel less fluid than competitors, and the absence of an always-on display [4, 30].

Users prioritizing a highly customizable Android experience, a larger display with a high refresh rate, and expandable storage may find the Samsung Galaxy A54 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, individuals who value a powerful and efficient processor, a highly integrated ecosystem, advanced camera features, and longer software support will likely lean towards the iPhone 16. Both devices offer a reliable daily experience, and choosing between them often comes down to personal preference for operating system and specific feature sets. For those considering a more sustainable choice, exploring quality-assured refurbished options for either model can provide an eco-friendly alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons