Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Vs iPhone 13

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Starting at

Refurbished price:£538.00

Versus £1,739.49 new

See options
iPhone 13
iPhone 13
Starting at

Refurbished price:£205.00

Versus £599.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the iPhone 13 represent distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality, catering to different user preferences. The iPhone 13, released in September 2021, is a traditional slab smartphone running on Apple's iOS ecosystem. In contrast, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, a newer generation foldable device, operates on Android and offers a unique form factor with an expansive internal display. These devices differ significantly in their physical design, display technology, and the core software experiences they provide.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key differentiators.

  • Release Timeline: The iPhone 13 was introduced in September 2021, making it a device from an earlier generation. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, as a newer generation foldable, benefits from a more recent release, placing it further along in its product lifecycle.
  • Software Longevity: The iPhone 13 is expected to receive major iOS updates for approximately 5 to 6 years from its release, with security updates potentially extending beyond that period. This means it will likely continue to receive OS upgrades until around 2027 or 2028. Google's newer Pixel devices, including its latest foldable offerings, typically receive a longer commitment of up to seven years of both OS and security updates, offering an extended period of software support.
  • Physical Durability: The iPhone 13 features a Ceramic Shield front cover and an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance, contributing to its robust build. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, with its foldable design, introduces a hinge mechanism and a flexible inner display, which present different considerations for long-term durability. It typically features an IPX8 water resistance rating and Gorilla Glass Victus on its outer display for protection.

Year of Release

2024

2021

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

iOS

Foldable

Yes

No

Performance

The performance capabilities of these two smartphones are shaped by their respective processors and system optimizations, influencing how they handle daily tasks and demanding applications.

  • Processing Power: The iPhone 13 is powered by an A15 Bionic chip, which, despite its age, continues to deliver responsive performance for everyday applications, multitasking, and many graphically intensive games. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, featuring a newer generation Tensor chip (such as the Tensor G4 or later), is designed for enhanced performance, particularly in areas leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning, offering smoother operation for advanced computational tasks and a more fluid user experience.
  • Multitasking and Responsiveness: Both devices are capable of handling multiple applications simultaneously. The iPhone 13, with its optimized iOS, provides a smooth and consistent user experience. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold, with its more recent processor and potentially higher RAM configurations, offers a robust platform for demanding multitasking and complex applications, especially those that benefit from advanced AI processing.
  • Battery Behavior: The iPhone 13 generally offers reliable battery life, with users often reporting it lasting through a full day of typical use. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, with its larger form factor and potentially larger battery capacity, is also designed to provide extended usage, though the power demands of its dual displays and advanced features can influence real-world battery duration.

Memory (GB)

16 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on these devices is significantly different, primarily due to their distinct form factors and display technologies.

  • Display Technology and Form Factor: The iPhone 13 features a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display, known for its deep blacks, vibrant colors, and excellent contrast. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold offers a unique foldable design, typically featuring a smaller external OLED display for quick interactions and a larger, expansive internal foldable OLED display when unfolded, providing a tablet-like viewing experience.
  • Resolution and Clarity: The iPhone 13 provides a sharp 1170x2532 pixel resolution at 460 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring clear and detailed visuals. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold's displays offer high resolutions (e.g., 1080p+ for both outer and inner screens) with pixel densities that ensure crisp text and images across its larger viewing areas.
  • Brightness and Smoothness: The iPhone 13's display reaches up to 800 nits typical brightness and 1200 nits peak for HDR content, offering good visibility in various lighting conditions. Its refresh rate is 60Hz. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold's displays typically feature higher refresh rates of 120Hz for smoother scrolling and animations, and its newer generation OLED panels are expected to offer high peak brightness levels, enhancing outdoor visibility and HDR content consumption.

Resolution

2076 x 2152

1170 x 2532

Audiovisual

Both devices offer advanced camera systems, but they excel in different aspects of photography and videography, reflecting their manufacturers' distinct imaging philosophies.

  • Camera System Configuration: The iPhone 13 features a dual 12MP camera system on the rear, comprising a main wide-angle lens with sensor-shift optical image stabilization and an ultra-wide-angle lens. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold typically boasts a more versatile triple-camera setup on its rear, including a high-resolution main sensor, an ultrawide lens, and a telephoto lens with optical zoom capabilities, offering greater flexibility for different photographic scenarios.
  • Photography Performance: The iPhone 13 is known for its consistent image quality, accurate color reproduction, and features like Smart HDR 4 and Photographic Styles. Its Cinematic Mode allows for video recording with a shallow depth of field. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold leverages Google's renowned computational photography, excelling in areas like low-light performance, detail retention, and advanced AI-driven features such as Magic Eraser and Real Tone. Its telephoto lens provides enhanced zoom capabilities.
  • Video Recording and Audio: Both devices are capable of high-quality video recording. The iPhone 13 supports HDR video recording with Dolby Vision up to 4K at 60 frames per second. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold also offers 4K video recording, often with advanced stabilization and features that benefit from its AI processing. Both devices provide clear microphone quality for calls and recording, and offer a good media consumption experience through their speakers.

Front camera

10 megapixels

12 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and differentiate these two devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both smartphones support 5G connectivity for fast mobile data. The iPhone 13 uses Apple's proprietary Lightning port for charging and data transfer, and supports Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.0. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, being an Android device, features a USB-C port, offering broader compatibility with accessories, and typically supports newer wireless standards like Wi-Fi 6E or Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3 or 5.4.
  • Biometric Security: The iPhone 13 relies on Face ID for secure facial recognition. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold typically incorporates both facial recognition (via its outer selfie camera) and a side-mounted fingerprint sensor for biometric authentication, offering users multiple options.
  • Design and Handling: The iPhone 13 has a compact and flat-edged design, weighing around 174 grams. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold, due to its foldable nature, has a different form factor; it is thicker when folded and wider when unfolded, with a weight around 283 grams for the original Pixel Fold, which impacts one-handed use and pocketability. Its build materials often include Gorilla Glass for the outer screen and a polished aluminum frame.

Weight

257 g

173 g

Screen size (in)

8.0

6.1

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

Lightning

The choice between the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the iPhone 13 largely depends on individual priorities and desired user experience. The iPhone 13 is frequently praised for its consistent performance, reliable camera system, and the long-term software support and ecosystem integration that Apple provides. Users often highlight its robust build and dependable battery life as strong points. Some common criticisms, however, include its 60Hz display refresh rate and the proprietary Lightning port.

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, as a newer generation foldable, garners praise for its innovative form factor, offering the versatility of a large tablet-like screen in a portable device. Its advanced Tensor processor and AI capabilities are often lauded for enhancing the user experience, particularly in computational photography and smart features. Users appreciate the expansive display for media consumption and multitasking. Potential concerns for foldable devices can sometimes revolve around the long-term durability of the inner screen and hinge, though manufacturers are continuously improving these aspects. The weight and thickness when folded are also considerations for some users.

Users prioritizing a compact, traditional smartphone experience with a highly integrated ecosystem and proven longevity will find the iPhone 13 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, users who value cutting-edge technology, a versatile foldable display for enhanced productivity and media, and Google's advanced AI features will likely lean towards the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold. Both devices offer compelling features, and for those seeking an eco-friendly alternative, quality-assured refurbished options are available for both models, providing a sustainable choice without compromising on functionality.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons