Galaxy S9 Vs iPhone XS

Galaxy S9
Galaxy S9
Starting at

Refurbished price:£77.00

Versus £449.00 new

See options
iPhone XS
iPhone XS
Starting at

Refurbished price:£94.00

Versus £399.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy S9, released in March 2018, and the iPhone Xs, launched in September 2018, represent flagship smartphones from their respective manufacturers during that era. While both devices offered premium experiences, they diverged significantly in their operating systems, design philosophies, and core features. The Galaxy S9 runs on the Android platform, offering a customizable experience, whereas the iPhone Xs operates on Apple's iOS, known for its integrated ecosystem. Key differentiators include their camera approaches, biometric security methods, and port selections.

Scores

Durability

Evaluating the practical lifespan of these devices in 2026 involves considering their release timelines, software support, and repairability.

  • Release Timeline and Age: The Galaxy S9 was released in March 2018, making it over eight years old, while the iPhone Xs followed in September 2018, now over seven years old. Both are considered older models in the current smartphone landscape.
  • OS Support Duration: The Galaxy S9 received its last major Android update with Android 10 in late 2020, and official security updates concluded in April 2022. This means it no longer receives critical security patches or new feature updates. The iPhone Xs, on the other hand, saw its major iOS support end in September 2025, with iOS 18 being its final major software version. Security updates for the iPhone Xs are expected to continue through late 2026.
  • Repairability: The Galaxy S9 received a low repairability score of 4 out of 10 from iFixit, primarily due to its glass construction and strong adhesive, making internal access challenging. The iPhone Xs, while also featuring a glass and metal construction, generally presents a moderate challenge for repairs, with some components being modular but overall requiring specialized tools and expertise.

Year of Release

2018

2018

Compatible with latest Update

No

Yes

OS

Android

iOS

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of these devices is influenced by their internal components, affecting how smoothly they handle applications and multitasking.

  • Storage Options: The Galaxy S9 offered internal storage options of 64GB, 128GB, and 256GB, with the added flexibility of expandable storage via a microSD card, supporting up to 400GB. The iPhone Xs came with 64GB, 256GB, or 512GB of internal storage, but it does not support expandable storage.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy S9 is equipped with a 3000 mAh battery. Users frequently reported needing to charge the device daily, with some experiencing around 7-8 hours of screen-on time under normal usage. The iPhone Xs features a 2658 mAh battery. Apple indicated it offered approximately 30 minutes longer battery life than its predecessor, the iPhone X, but users generally found it required daily charging, especially with moderate to heavy use.
  • Overall System Responsiveness: The Galaxy S9, powered by its current-generation processor at the time of release, capably handles everyday tasks and older mobile games. However, with the increasing demands of modern applications and more graphically intensive games, users may observe occasional slowdowns or longer loading times. The iPhone Xs, featuring its own advanced processor, maintains a strong level of performance for many contemporary applications and games. While it still offers a fluid user experience, very demanding new titles or intensive multitasking might push its processing capabilities to their limits.

Memory (GB)

4 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on both smartphones is delivered through their respective display technologies and specifications.

  • Display Technology: The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a Super AMOLED display, known for its deep blacks and vibrant color reproduction. The iPhone Xs utilizes a Super Retina OLED display, which also provides rich colors and high contrast.
  • Resolution and Clarity: The Galaxy S9 offers a 5.8-inch display with a resolution of 2960 x 1440 pixels, resulting in a pixel density of 570 pixels per inch (ppi). The iPhone Xs also has a 5.8-inch display, with a resolution of 2436 x 1125 pixels and a pixel density of 458 ppi. Both displays deliver sharp and clear visuals for typical viewing distances.
  • Brightness and Smoothness: Both devices provide good brightness levels, ensuring adequate visibility in various lighting conditions, including outdoor use. The Galaxy S9 was particularly noted for its high brightness and low screen reflectance. Both the Galaxy S9 and iPhone Xs feature a standard 60Hz refresh rate, offering a smooth experience for general navigation and content consumption.

Resolution

1440 x 2960

1125 x 2436

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Super Retina OLED

Audiovisual

The photographic and videographic capabilities of these smartphones offer distinct approaches to capturing images and videos.

  • Camera System Capabilities: The Galaxy S9 is equipped with a single 12-megapixel main rear camera that features a variable aperture (f/1.5-f/2.4), allowing it to adjust to different lighting conditions. It also has an 8-megapixel front-facing camera. The iPhone Xs features a dual-camera system on the rear, consisting of a 12-megapixel wide-angle lens (f/1.8) and a 12-megapixel telephoto lens (f/2.4), providing optical zoom capabilities. Its front camera is 7-megapixels.
  • Photography Performance: For its time, the Galaxy S9's variable aperture contributed to its strong low-light performance. The iPhone Xs, with its dual cameras and Smart HDR feature, offered versatility in photography, including improved dynamic range and portrait mode effects.
  • Video Recording and Audio: Both devices are capable of recording video at up to 4K resolution at 60 frames per second. The iPhone Xs was notable as one of the first iPhones to record stereo audio for videos, enhancing the audio quality of recorded footage. Both phones feature stereo speakers, with the Galaxy S9 noted by some reviewers for producing a more robust and clearer sound compared to the iPhone X.

Main camera

12 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

8 megapixels

7 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy S9 and iPhone Xs support 4G LTE for cellular data, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) for wireless internet, and Bluetooth 5.0 for connecting accessories. The Galaxy S9 includes a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, along with a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack. The iPhone Xs uses Apple's proprietary Lightning port and does not feature a 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Biometric Security: The Galaxy S9 offers multiple biometric options, including a rear-mounted fingerprint sensor, an iris scanner, and facial recognition. The iPhone Xs relies primarily on Face ID, Apple's facial recognition system, for secure unlocking and authentication.
  • Build Materials and Handling: The Galaxy S9 weighs 163 grams, while the iPhone Xs is slightly heavier at 177 grams. Both devices feature a construction of glass on the front and back. The Galaxy S9 uses an aluminum frame, while the iPhone Xs incorporates a more robust stainless steel frame. Both phones carry an IP68 rating for water and dust resistance, indicating they can withstand submersion in up to 2 meters of water for 30 minutes.

Weight

163 g

177 g

Screen size (in)

5.8

5.8

Mobile network

4G

4G

SIM card

Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

Lightning

User sentiment for both the Galaxy S9 and iPhone Xs, as observed in various online discussions, reflects their strengths and weaknesses as older flagship devices. The Galaxy S9 was often praised for its vibrant Super AMOLED display, the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and its expandable storage options. However, common criticisms frequently centered on its battery life, which many users found to be merely adequate for a full day, and the relatively shorter period of software updates compared to its Apple counterpart. The iPhone Xs, conversely, garnered appreciation for its consistent performance, the quality of its OLED display, and its capable camera system. User concerns often revolved around its battery life, which some found less enduring than desired, the presence of the display notch, and the absence of a headphone jack.

For users prioritizing an open operating system, the flexibility of expandable storage, and the convenience of a traditional headphone jack, the Galaxy S9 could be a suitable choice, provided they are comfortable with a device that no longer receives software updates. Conversely, individuals who prefer the iOS ecosystem, value strong performance for an older device, and rely on Face ID for security might find the iPhone Xs more aligned with their needs, acknowledging its limited remaining software support. Both devices, while no longer receiving the latest software, can still serve as functional smartphones for everyday tasks. Exploring quality-assured refurbished options for either model presents an eco-friendly alternative for those seeking a reliable device without contributing to new electronic waste.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons