Galaxy S21 5G Vs iPhone 16 Pro

Galaxy S21 5G
Galaxy S21 5G
Starting at

Refurbished price:£133.00

Versus £829.00 new

See options
iPhone 16 Pro
iPhone 16 Pro
Starting at

Refurbished price:£564.00

Versus £999.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy S21 5G (2021) and the iPhone 16 Pro (2024) represent two distinct generations of flagship smartphone technology. While the Galaxy S21 was a pioneer of the modern Android experience, the iPhone 16 Pro introduces the latest advancements in Apple's ecosystem. These devices differ significantly in their release dates, operating systems, and hardware capabilities. Choosing between them involves weighing the familiarity of Android against the high-performance features of a newer iOS device. Both offer premium experiences tailored to different user needs and software preferences.

As a sustainable choice, selecting a quality-assured refurbished option allows users to access high-end technology while reducing electronic waste. This comparison explores how these two devices stack up in real-world usage, focusing on durability, performance, and overall utility for the modern consumer.

Scores

Durability

The three-year gap between these models significantly impacts their long-term software support and physical resilience in daily environments.

  • Software Longevity: The iPhone 16 Pro, launched in 2024, is expected to receive system updates until approximately 2030, whereas the Galaxy S21 is nearing the end of its major update cycle. This makes the iPhone a more suitable choice for users who plan to keep their device for many years.
  • Build Materials: The iPhone 16 Pro features a titanium frame and Ceramic Shield glass for enhanced drop protection, while the Galaxy S21 uses a reinforced polycarbonate back which is durable and resistant to cracks but offers a different tactile experience.
  • Environmental Resistance: Both devices carry high ratings for dust and water resistance, ensuring they can withstand accidental submersions or heavy rain. However, the newer seals on the iPhone 16 Pro may provide more reliable protection over time compared to an older device.

Year of Release

2021

2024

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Performance differences are most noticeable when running demanding applications or multitasking between several high-resource tools throughout the day.

  • System Responsiveness: The iPhone 16 Pro handles intensive tasks like high-definition video editing and complex gaming with ease due to its more recent internal hardware. The Galaxy S21 remains efficient for daily browsing and social media but may show slight delays when launching the latest heavy applications.
  • Battery Management: Users will find that the iPhone 16 Pro offers longer active screen time on a single charge thanks to more efficient power management. The Galaxy S21, while reliable, may require more frequent charging for power users who engage in heavy media consumption.
  • Multitasking: Both devices feature 8GB of memory, but the way the operating systems manage background apps differs. The iPhone prioritizes immediate responsiveness for the active app, while the Galaxy S21 allows for more persistent background processes, which can be useful for certain productivity workflows.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

Both smartphones feature high-quality displays with smooth motion, though the iPhone 16 Pro benefits from more recent panel technology and higher peak brightness.

  • Display Technology: The iPhone 16 Pro uses an advanced OLED screen that can adjust its refresh rate dynamically to save battery. The Galaxy S21 features a vibrant AMOLED display with a high refresh rate that ensures scrolling through feeds and menus feels fluid and responsive.
  • Outdoor Visibility: The iPhone 16 Pro reaches significantly higher brightness levels, making it much easier to read and view content under direct sunlight. The Galaxy S21 performs well in most lighting conditions but may struggle slightly in extremely bright outdoor environments.
  • Viewing Experience: The Galaxy S21 offers a 6.2-inch screen with very slim bezels, providing an immersive feel. The iPhone 16 Pro provides a slightly larger 6.3-inch area with a more interactive cutout at the top for notifications and system alerts, which many users find helpful for quick interactions.

Resolution

1080 x 2400

1206 x 2622

Screen type

Dynamic AMOLED 2X

LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED

Audiovisual

The camera systems reflect the evolution of mobile photography, with the iPhone 16 Pro offering more advanced zoom and professional video capabilities.

  • Photography Versatility: The iPhone 16 Pro includes a high-resolution main sensor and a dedicated 5x optical zoom lens for capturing distant subjects clearly. The Galaxy S21 relies on a high-resolution telephoto sensor for hybrid zooming, which is effective for casual photography but lacks the reach of the newer model.
  • Video Production: For content creators, the iPhone 16 Pro provides professional-grade video recording features and superior microphone isolation for clear audio. The Galaxy S21 offers reliable 8K recording, which is excellent for capturing high-detail clips that can be cropped later without losing clarity.
  • Low-Light Performance: The iPhone 16 Pro excels in nighttime photography, producing images with less noise and more natural colors. The Galaxy S21 still produces respectable low-light photos, though users may notice more processing and smoothing in very dark environments.

Main camera

12 megapixels

48 megapixels

Front camera

10 megapixels

12 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Practical daily usage is influenced by the physical design, connectivity standards, and the specific ports available on each device.

  • Connectivity and Ports: The iPhone 16 Pro uses a universal USB-C port and supports the latest high-speed Wi-Fi standards for faster downloads. The Galaxy S21 also uses USB-C, making it compatible with most modern charging cables, though its wireless connectivity is based on slightly older standards.
  • Biometrics: The Galaxy S21 utilizes an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor built directly into the screen, which works even if fingers are slightly damp. The iPhone 16 Pro relies on facial recognition technology, which is highly secure and works well in most lighting conditions.
  • Portability: The Galaxy S21 is notably lighter due to its material choices, making it very comfortable for one-handed use over long periods. The iPhone 16 Pro has a more substantial weight and a slightly larger footprint, giving it a very solid and sturdy feel in the hand.

Weight

169 g

199 g

Screen size (in)

6.2

6.3

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback from various forums highlights distinct strengths for both devices. Galaxy S21 owners often praise its ergonomic design and the reliability of the in-display fingerprint sensor, though some note that battery health naturally declines after several years of use. Conversely, iPhone 16 Pro users frequently commend the exceptional camera quality and the fluid integration of the software, though the weight of the titanium frame is a common point of discussion among those transitioning from lighter models.

Choosing between these two depends on your specific priorities. Users who prefer a lightweight, familiar Android experience for everyday tasks like messaging and browsing will find the Galaxy S21 a practical and capable choice. Those who require the latest camera technology, long-term software support, and high-performance capabilities for professional work or intensive gaming will likely lean toward the iPhone 16 Pro. For those looking to make a sustainable choice, opting for an eco-friendly alternative like a quality-assured refurbished device is an excellent way to access premium technology while supporting a circular economy. Ultimately, both smartphones serve their respective audiences well, providing reliable performance and a high-quality user experience within their ecosystems.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons