Galaxy A25 Vs Google Pixel Fold

Galaxy A25
Galaxy A25
Starting at

Refurbished price:£121.00

Versus £272.58 new

See options
Google Pixel Fold
Google Pixel Fold
Starting at

Refurbished price:£371.00

Versus £1,499.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A25, released in December 2023, and the Google Pixel Fold, launched in June 2023, represent distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. While both operate on the Android platform, the Galaxy A25 offers a traditional smartphone experience, focusing on core features and reliability. In contrast, the Pixel Fold introduces a foldable design, providing a larger, adaptable screen for enhanced multitasking and media consumption.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key factors.

  • Release Timeline: The Google Pixel Fold was released in June 2023, making it slightly older than the Samsung Galaxy A25, which launched in December 2023. This difference in release date impacts their respective software support cycles.
  • Software Support: The Galaxy A25 is expected to receive four major Android OS upgrades and five years of security updates from its release, with security updates typically delivered quarterly. The Pixel Fold, on the other hand, is guaranteed five years of both OS and security updates from its launch, extending its software longevity until at least June 2028. [3, 8, 9, 12, 16, 17, 29, 36]
  • Physical Durability: The Pixel Fold features a more premium construction with glass and an aluminum frame, along with an IPX8 water resistance rating, indicating protection against submersion. [13, 20, 25, 32] The Galaxy A25 utilizes a plastic back and frame with a glass front, offering a robust build for its category, though without a specific IP rating widely publicized. [8, 14, 23] The foldable nature of the Pixel Fold introduces a unique durability consideration for its inner display and hinge mechanism.

Year of Release

2023

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

The performance capabilities of these two smartphones cater to different user expectations, largely influenced by their internal components and design philosophies.

  • Processing Power: The Google Pixel Fold is equipped with a processor designed for demanding tasks, enabling smooth operation across various applications, including intensive gaming and complex multitasking. [10, 22, 27] The Galaxy A25 features a processor that handles everyday applications and general smartphone usage competently. However, for users who frequently engage in high-performance activities, some reviews suggest it may exhibit occasional sluggishness. [16, 23, 27, 30]
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Pixel Fold typically comes with a higher amount of RAM, which contributes to its ability to manage numerous applications simultaneously without significant slowdowns. It also offers larger internal storage options, though without expandable storage. [2, 5, 10, 13] The Galaxy A25 provides ample RAM for typical usage and offers expandable storage via a microSD card, allowing users to increase storage capacity for media and files. [1, 6, 8, 24]
  • Battery Behavior: Both devices feature substantial battery capacities. The Galaxy A25, with its 5000 mAh battery, is noted for its extended battery life, often lasting a full day or more even with moderate to heavy use. [1, 14, 23, 27, 30] The Pixel Fold, with a 4821 mAh battery, aims to provide a full day of use, though its larger, foldable display can consume more power, potentially requiring more frequent charging for heavy users. [2, 20, 22, 31]

Memory (GB)

6 GB

12 GB

Screen quality

The display experience is a primary differentiator between the Galaxy A25 and the Pixel Fold, owing to their fundamental design variations.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Galaxy A25 features a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display, known for its vibrant colors and deep blacks, offering a clear and engaging viewing experience in a traditional form factor. [1, 4, 8, 16, 23, 27] The Pixel Fold offers a dual-screen setup: a 5.8-inch OLED cover display for quick interactions and a large 7.6-inch foldable OLED main display when unfolded. This larger internal screen provides an expansive canvas for productivity and media. [2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13]
  • Resolution and Clarity: Both devices offer high-resolution displays. The Galaxy A25 has a 2340x1080 pixel resolution, providing sharp images and text. [1, 8] The Pixel Fold's main display boasts a 2208x1840 pixel resolution, offering exceptional clarity across its larger surface, while its cover display also maintains a high resolution for crisp visuals. [2, 5, 7, 11]
  • Brightness and Smoothness: Both phones feature 120Hz refresh rates, contributing to smooth scrolling and responsive interactions. [4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 16, 23] The Pixel Fold's displays generally achieve higher peak brightness levels, which can enhance visibility in bright outdoor conditions and improve HDR content viewing. [11, 25] The Galaxy A25 also offers good brightness, making it perfectly usable outdoors. [27, 30]

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1840 x 2208

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Foldable OLED

Audiovisual

The camera systems on the Galaxy A25 and Pixel Fold offer different strengths, catering to varying photography needs and preferences.

  • Rear Camera Setup: The Galaxy A25 is equipped with a triple-camera system, including a 50-megapixel main sensor with optical image stabilization, an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 2-megapixel macro lens. [4, 8, 14, 27] The Pixel Fold also features a triple-camera array, comprising a 48-megapixel main sensor with optical image stabilization, a 10.8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 10.8-megapixel telephoto lens capable of 5x optical zoom. [5, 11, 20, 27, 31, 32]
  • Photography Performance: The Galaxy A25's main camera performs well in good lighting conditions, producing vibrant images, but its performance can be inconsistent in low-light or indoor settings, and the ultrawide camera may lack detail. [14, 23, 27, 30] The Pixel Fold's camera system is praised for its overall balance, computational photography, and ability to produce realistic photos with good detail and dynamic range, even in challenging conditions, including impressive zoom capabilities. [10, 11, 20, 22, 27, 31, 32]
  • Video and Front Cameras: For video recording, the Galaxy A25 supports up to 4K at 30 frames per second. Its front camera is a 13-megapixel sensor. [8, 27, 30] The Pixel Fold can record video at up to 4K at 60 frames per second and includes two front-facing cameras: a 9.5-megapixel sensor on the cover display and an 8-megapixel sensor on the inner display, offering flexibility for selfies and video calls. [25, 31, 32]

Main camera

50 megapixels

48 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both smartphones support 5G connectivity, ensuring access to fast mobile data networks. [7, 8, 19] The Galaxy A25 includes a 3.5mm headphone jack, a feature absent on the Pixel Fold. Both devices utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer. [7, 8] The Pixel Fold supports Wi-Fi 6, while the Galaxy A25 supports Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). [8, 25]
  • Biometrics and Sensors: The Galaxy A25 features a side-mounted fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. [4, 6, 8] The Pixel Fold also incorporates a fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button, alongside face unlock capabilities. [6, 13, 22, 25] The Pixel Fold also includes an Ultra-Wideband (UWB) chip, which can enhance location tracking and connectivity with compatible devices. [13]
  • Physical Characteristics: The Galaxy A25 has a traditional slab form factor, weighing approximately 197 grams and measuring 161 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm. [8, 21, 25] The Pixel Fold, being a foldable device, has different dimensions when folded (139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1 mm) and unfolded (158.7 x 139.7 x 5.8 mm), and is heavier at 283 grams. [5, 13, 20, 21, 25] Its wider, shorter folded form factor aims to make the cover screen more usable than some other foldables. [11]

Weight

197 g

283 g

Screen size (in)

6.5

7.6

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

User feedback for the Samsung Galaxy A25 often highlights its strong battery life and vibrant Super AMOLED display as significant advantages, particularly for its segment. [14, 23, 27, 30] Some users note that while its performance is adequate for daily tasks, it may not satisfy those seeking a device for intensive gaming or heavy multitasking. [16, 30] The camera system is generally considered competent for well-lit conditions, though it can struggle in more challenging environments. [14, 23, 30]

The Google Pixel Fold receives praise for its innovative foldable design, offering a large internal screen that enhances productivity and media consumption. [10, 22, 31] Its camera system, benefiting from Google's computational photography, is frequently lauded for producing high-quality, realistic images. [10, 11, 20, 27, 31, 32] Criticisms sometimes point to its weight and the visible crease on the inner display, as well as battery life that, while decent, may not always match the demands of its expansive screen. [13, 20, 22]

Users prioritizing a long-lasting battery, a traditional smartphone form factor, and expandable storage for media may find the Galaxy A25 well-suited to their needs. It offers a reliable experience for everyday communication and content viewing. Conversely, users who value an expansive, adaptable screen for multitasking, media immersion, and a highly capable camera system with advanced zoom features may lean toward the Google Pixel Fold. Its unique design caters to those seeking a more versatile and innovative mobile experience. Both devices are available as quality-assured refurbished options, providing an eco-friendly alternative for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons