Galaxy A23 5G Vs Google Pixel 8 Pro

Galaxy A23 5G
Galaxy A23 5G
Starting at

Refurbished price:£100.00

Versus £300.00 new

See options
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Starting at

Refurbished price:£253.00

Versus £960.91 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, released in 2022, and the Google Pixel 8 Pro, launched in late 2023, represent distinct offerings in the smartphone market. While both operate on the Android platform, the Pixel 8 Pro distinguishes itself with a more advanced camera system, a premium display, and a significantly longer software support commitment. The Galaxy A23 5G, on the other hand, focuses on delivering essential smartphone features with a robust battery.

Scores

Durability

The practical lifespan of a smartphone is heavily influenced by its software support and physical durability. These two devices offer different timelines and build qualities.

  • Software Longevity: The Google Pixel 8 Pro stands out with an industry-leading commitment of seven years of operating system upgrades, security updates, and feature drops, extending its support well into 2030. This ensures the device remains current and secure for an extended period. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, typical for its category, generally receives fewer major OS updates and security patches, offering a shorter software lifespan.
  • Physical Durability: The Pixel 8 Pro features a more robust construction with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both the front and back, coupled with an aluminum frame and an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance. The Galaxy A23 5G utilizes Gorilla Glass 5 for its display and a plastic back and frame, providing a good level of everyday protection but without an official IP rating.
  • Repairability: The Pixel 8 Pro has been noted to have a moderately low repairability score due to components like a glued battery and soldered charging port, making DIY repairs challenging. The Pixel 8 (non-Pro) has a higher repairability score, but the Pro model's complexity is a factor. Information on the A23 5G's specific repairability score is less prominent, but its construction suggests a more straightforward approach to some common repairs.

Year of Release

2022

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Performance differences between these two smartphones are notable, impacting how smoothly they handle various tasks and applications.

  • Processing Power: The Google Pixel 8 Pro is equipped with a high-performance processor designed for demanding applications, advanced AI features, and seamless multitasking. This allows for fluid navigation, rapid app loading, and efficient handling of intensive games or creative tasks. The Galaxy A23 5G features a mid-range processor that capably handles everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, but may exhibit slower performance with more resource-intensive applications or heavy multitasking.
  • Multitasking and Responsiveness: With a generous amount of RAM, the Pixel 8 Pro maintains numerous applications in memory, allowing users to switch between them quickly without significant reloading. The Galaxy A23 5G, available with varying RAM configurations, may require apps to reload more frequently when switching, particularly with the lower RAM variants, which some users have reported can lead to a less fluid experience.
  • Battery Behavior: Both devices feature large battery capacities. The Galaxy A23 5G's 5000 mAh battery, combined with its less demanding processor and display technology, generally provides extended usage on a single charge, often lasting a full day or more for many users. The Pixel 8 Pro, with its 5050 mAh battery, also aims for all-day power, though its more powerful components and brighter display may lead to varied endurance depending on usage patterns.

Memory (GB)

4 GB

12 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience on these devices differs significantly due to their display technologies and specifications.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Google Pixel 8 Pro features a 6.7-inch LTPO OLED display, known for its deep blacks, vibrant colors, and excellent contrast. Its higher resolution contributes to sharp text and detailed images. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G uses a 6.6-inch PLS LCD panel, which offers good color reproduction and viewing angles for its class, but does not achieve the same level of contrast or black depth as an OLED display.
  • Brightness and Outdoor Visibility: The Pixel 8 Pro's display is notably brighter, with high HDR brightness and a very high peak brightness, making it highly visible even in direct sunlight. This is beneficial for outdoor use and HDR content consumption. The Galaxy A23 5G's LCD screen offers adequate brightness for most indoor conditions and some outdoor use, but it may struggle more in very bright environments.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: Both phones offer a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and more fluid animations. The Pixel 8 Pro's LTPO technology allows its refresh rate to adapt dynamically from 1Hz to 120Hz, optimizing power efficiency. The Galaxy A23 5G maintains a consistent 120Hz refresh rate, providing a smooth experience for supported content.

Resolution

1080 x 2408

1344 x 2992

Screen type

PLS LCD

LTPO OLED

Audiovisual

The camera systems on these two smartphones cater to different user expectations and offer varying levels of photographic capability.

  • Rear Camera Versatility: The Google Pixel 8 Pro boasts a comprehensive triple-camera setup, including a 50MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 48MP ultrawide lens with a wide field of view and autofocus, and a 48MP telephoto lens offering 5x optical zoom and up to 30x digital zoom. This array provides extensive flexibility for various shooting scenarios, from expansive landscapes to distant subjects. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G features a quad-camera system with a 50MP main sensor (OIS), a 5MP ultrawide, and two 2MP sensors for macro and depth. Its ultrawide lens offers a more limited field of view and lower resolution compared to the Pixel.
  • Photography Performance: The Pixel 8 Pro excels in image processing, delivering detailed photos with natural colors and strong dynamic range, particularly in challenging lighting conditions and low light. Its advanced computational photography features enhance overall image quality. The Galaxy A23 5G's main camera performs well in good lighting, producing colorful and well-exposed images. However, its ultrawide and other auxiliary lenses may show reduced detail and struggle more in low-light environments.
  • Video Recording and Audio: The Pixel 8 Pro offers high-quality video recording, including 4K at 60fps from its main and front cameras, with improved stabilization and audio capture. The Galaxy A23 5G supports video recording at 1080p 30fps across its main, ultrawide, and selfie cameras, with 4x slow-motion at 720p on the main lens. The Pixel 8 Pro generally provides a more refined video experience and better speaker output for media consumption.

Main camera

50 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

8 megapixels

10.5 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance and display, several practical elements differentiate these two devices in daily use.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both phones support 5G connectivity for fast mobile data. The Pixel 8 Pro features newer Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3 standards, offering potentially faster and more stable wireless connections. The Galaxy A23 5G supports Wi-Fi 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5) and Bluetooth 5.1. The Galaxy A23 5G retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, a feature absent on the Pixel 8 Pro, which relies solely on its USB-C port for wired audio and charging.
  • Biometric Security: The Pixel 8 Pro includes an under-display optical fingerprint sensor and advanced facial recognition for secure unlocking. The Galaxy A23 5G features a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, which some users find convenient, and basic facial recognition.
  • Design and Handling: The Pixel 8 Pro has a more premium feel with its glass and aluminum construction, weighing 213g. Its dimensions are 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8mm. The Galaxy A23 5G, at 197g and 167.20 x 76.40 x 9.00mm, is slightly lighter and taller, with a plastic build that can offer a more secure grip for some users.

Weight

197 g

213 g

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.7

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

User feedback for the Google Pixel 8 Pro frequently praises its exceptional camera capabilities, often highlighting its ability to capture detailed and vibrant photos in various conditions, including low light. Users also appreciate the clean Android experience and the promise of extended software support. Some common criticisms include occasional reports of the device getting warm under heavy load and, for some, the battery life not always meeting expectations, especially with intensive use. The Pixel 8 Pro is generally seen as a device that excels in photography and offers a smooth software experience.

For the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, users often commend its long battery life and the inclusion of a 120Hz display at its price point. The main camera's performance in good lighting is also frequently noted as a positive. However, some users have expressed concerns about the overall system responsiveness, particularly with lower RAM variants, and the performance of its auxiliary cameras in less ideal conditions. There are also mixed opinions on its long-term performance and software updates.

Users prioritizing a cutting-edge camera system, a vibrant OLED display, and the longest possible software support will find the Google Pixel 8 Pro well-suited to their needs. Its advanced processing power also benefits those who engage in demanding tasks or enjoy the latest AI features. Conversely, users who prioritize extended battery life, a smooth high-refresh-rate display for everyday tasks, and the convenience of a headphone jack may lean toward the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G. Both devices offer a gateway to the Android ecosystem, and considering a quality-assured refurbished option can be an eco-friendly alternative for either model.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons