Galaxy A36 Vs Galaxy Z Fold7

Galaxy A36
Galaxy A36
Starting at

Refurbished price:£206.00

Versus £369.00 new

See options
Galaxy Z Fold7
Galaxy Z Fold7
Starting at

Refurbished price:£916.00

Versus £1,799.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A36, released in March 2025, is a traditional smartphone designed to offer a balanced experience for everyday use. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, also launched in 2025, represents a premium foldable device, providing a unique dual-screen experience. Both devices operate on the Android platform, featuring Samsung's One UI, but cater to distinct user needs through their form factors and capabilities.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, both offer substantial software support, a key factor in their practical lifespan.

  • Software Updates: The Galaxy A36 is expected to receive up to six years of Android operating system upgrades and security patches, ensuring prolonged access to new features and security enhancements. The Galaxy Z Fold7, as a flagship device, also benefits from a similar commitment to long-term software support, typically receiving seven major OS upgrades and security updates.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A36 features an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, along with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both its front and back, contributing to its resilience against daily wear and accidental exposure. The Galaxy Z Fold7, with its innovative foldable design, is built with durable materials, though its complex hinge mechanism and internal folding screen present different considerations for long-term physical integrity compared to a traditional slab phone.
  • Expected Lifespan: Users can anticipate a practical lifespan of several years from both models, with the A36 offering robust protection for its form factor, and the Z Fold7 balancing its advanced design with enhanced build quality for a foldable.

Year of Release

2025

2025

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

The performance profiles of the Galaxy A36 and Galaxy Z Fold7 are tailored to their respective market segments, impacting how they handle various tasks.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A36 is equipped with a processor that capably handles daily applications, web browsing, and social media, providing a smooth experience for general use. It can manage moderately demanding games, though it is not designed for intensive gaming sessions or heavy multitasking with numerous demanding applications. The Galaxy Z Fold7, featuring a high-end processor, delivers robust performance suitable for the most demanding applications, intensive gaming, and seamless multitasking across its multiple screens.
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Galaxy A36 is available with various RAM configurations, typically 6GB, 8GB, or 12GB, and internal storage options of 128GB or 256GB. While some sources indicate no expandable storage, others suggest microSD card support up to 1TB. The Galaxy Z Fold7, designed for power users, offers ample RAM and internal storage, facilitating efficient app switching and handling large files without performance degradation.
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A36's 5000mAh battery consistently provides a full day of moderate to heavy use, often extending beyond. Its 45W fast charging capability allows for quick recharges. The Galaxy Z Fold7, with a 4400mAh battery, offers good battery life, though heavy use of its larger internal display can lead to more frequent charging. It supports 25W wired and 15W wireless charging.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

12 GB

Screen quality

The display technologies and configurations are a primary differentiator between these two Samsung smartphones.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Galaxy A36 features a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution (2340x1080 pixels). This panel delivers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and clear visuals, making it suitable for media consumption and everyday tasks. The Galaxy Z Fold7 offers a dual-screen setup: a 6.5-inch cover display and a larger 8-inch internal foldable display. Both are high-resolution AMOLED panels, providing exceptional clarity and color accuracy, with the internal screen offering an expansive canvas for immersive viewing.
  • Brightness and Smoothness: Both devices boast a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and responsive interactions. The Galaxy A36 achieves a peak brightness of 1200 nits, with up to 1900 nits for HDR content, providing good visibility outdoors. The Galaxy Z Fold7's displays reach an even higher peak brightness of 2600 nits, offering excellent legibility even in bright sunlight.
  • Viewing Experience: The A36's large, flat display provides a traditional smartphone viewing experience. The Z Fold7's wider cover screen enhances usability when folded, while the large internal screen transforms the device into a tablet-like experience, ideal for multitasking, reading, and watching videos.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1968 x 2184

Audiovisual

The camera systems on the Galaxy A36 and Galaxy Z Fold7 are designed to meet different photographic expectations.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy A36 features a triple-camera setup with a 50-megapixel main sensor, an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 5-megapixel macro lens. The main camera captures solid images in good lighting conditions, with optical image stabilization (OIS) aiding in clearer shots. The ultrawide and macro lenses offer additional versatility, though their performance may not match the main sensor. The Galaxy Z Fold7 boasts a more advanced triple-camera system, including a 200-megapixel main sensor with OIS, a 10-megapixel telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom, and a 12-megapixel ultrawide lens with autofocus and macro capabilities. This setup delivers flagship-level image quality, with excellent detail and dynamic range.
  • Photography Performance: In everyday photography, the A36 produces good results, but its low-light performance is less impressive. The Z Fold7 excels in various lighting conditions, including low light, thanks to its larger sensor and advanced processing. The 3x optical zoom on the Fold7 provides clear zoomed-in shots, though some users may desire greater zoom range.
  • Video and Selfie Capabilities: Both devices are capable of recording video, with the A36 supporting up to 4K at 30 frames per second. The A36 has a 12-megapixel front camera for selfies. The Z Fold7 offers high-quality video recording and includes two 10-megapixel selfie cameras, one on the cover screen and one under the main display, providing flexible options for video calls and self-portraits.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements differentiate the user experience of these two devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy A36 and Galaxy Z Fold7 support 5G connectivity, ensuring fast mobile data speeds. They also feature modern Wi-Fi standards and Bluetooth for wireless connections. Both devices utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer, though the A36's USB 2.0 standard offers slower data transfer speeds compared to the Z Fold7's likely faster USB standard. Neither device includes a traditional headphone jack.
  • Biometric Security: The Galaxy A36 incorporates an in-display fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. The Galaxy Z Fold7 also features a fingerprint sensor, typically side-mounted, alongside advanced facial recognition technology, offering multiple convenient and secure authentication methods.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A36 has a slim profile at 7.4mm thick and weighs 195g, with a plastic construction that contributes to its lighter feel. The Galaxy Z Fold7, despite its foldable nature, is remarkably thin when unfolded (4.2mm) and relatively compact when closed (8.9mm), weighing less than some traditional flagship phones. Its design allows for a comfortable grip when folded, and an expansive tablet-like experience when unfolded.

Weight

195 g

187 g

Screen size (in)

6,74

8

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

User feedback for the Samsung Galaxy A36 often highlights its strong battery life, vibrant AMOLED display, and the commitment to long-term software updates as significant advantages. Users appreciate its reliable performance for daily tasks and media consumption. Criticisms sometimes point to its performance not being a substantial leap over predecessors and its camera system, while solid, not excelling in challenging low-light conditions. The in-display fingerprint sensor has also received mixed reviews regarding its responsiveness.

For the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, common praise centers on its innovative and refined foldable design, the practicality of its wider cover screen, and the immersive experience of its large internal display for multitasking and media. The significantly upgraded main camera system is also a frequent highlight. However, users often express concerns about its battery life, which, while improved, may not consistently last a full day with heavy use of the inner screen. The telephoto camera, while capable, is sometimes noted as less versatile than those on some non-foldable flagships. The presence of a visible crease on the internal display, though improved, is also a recurring point of discussion.

Users prioritizing a dependable smartphone with a great display, long battery life, and extended software support for everyday communication and media will find the Galaxy A36 well-suited to their needs. It offers a robust experience in a traditional form factor. Conversely, users seeking an innovative device that combines the portability of a smartphone with the expansive screen real estate of a tablet, coupled with a powerful camera system and top-tier performance, may lean towards the Galaxy Z Fold7. Its unique design caters to those who value multitasking and immersive viewing experiences above all else. Both devices, whether new or as a quality-assured refurbished option, provide distinct advantages depending on individual preferences and usage patterns.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons