Galaxy S24 Vs Galaxy S24 FE

Galaxy S24
Galaxy S24
Starting at

Refurbished price:£273.00

Versus £817.67 new

See options
Galaxy S24 FE
Galaxy S24 FE
Starting at

Refurbished price:£250.00

Versus £741.91 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy S24, released in January 2024, and the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (Fan Edition), launched in October 2024, are both Android smartphones offering distinct experiences within the same product family. While sharing the foundational Android 14 operating system and Samsung's One UI, the S24 presents a more compact, premium build, whereas the S24 FE offers a larger display and battery, often with slight adjustments to internal components and materials.

Scores

Durability

Both devices benefit from Samsung's commitment to extended software support, ensuring a long practical lifespan.

  • Release Timeline: The Galaxy S24 was released in January 2024, while the Galaxy S24 FE followed in October 2024. This difference means the S24 FE will receive software updates for approximately nine months longer than its counterpart.
  • Software Longevity: Both the Galaxy S24 and S24 FE are part of Samsung's commitment to providing up to seven years of operating system and security updates, extending their usability well into the future.
  • Build Durability: The Galaxy S24 features an aluminum frame and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for display protection, offering robust resistance to drops and scratches. The Galaxy S24 FE utilizes a plastic frame and Gorilla Glass Victus Plus, which provides good protection but is a slightly older generation of glass. Both devices carry an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance.

Year of Release

2024

2024

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance profiles of the Galaxy S24 and S24 FE cater to slightly different user expectations, primarily due to their internal hardware configurations.

  • Everyday Responsiveness: The Galaxy S24 delivers consistently swift performance, handling demanding applications and multitasking with ease, making it suitable for power users and mobile gaming enthusiasts. The Galaxy S24 FE also provides smooth performance for daily tasks and most applications, with users reporting a snappy experience.
  • Battery Endurance: The Galaxy S24 is equipped with a 4000mAh battery, which users report can last a full day with moderate use, often requiring a few days for the device to optimize its battery performance. The Galaxy S24 FE features a larger 4700mAh battery, generally offering extended usage times, with some users noting good battery life, especially when utilizing power-saving settings.
  • Storage and Multitasking: Both models typically come with 8GB of RAM, providing ample capacity for efficient multitasking. Storage options for the S24 include 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB, while the S24 FE is available in 128GB and 256GB configurations.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

Both devices offer vibrant and fluid viewing experiences, though with some key distinctions in their display specifications.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Galaxy S24 features a 6.2-inch Dynamic AMOLED display, providing a compact form factor. The Galaxy S24 FE offers a larger 6.7-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display, appealing to users who prefer more screen real estate for media consumption or productivity.
  • Brightness and Clarity: The S24's display boasts a peak brightness of 2600 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in bright outdoor conditions. The S24 FE's display reaches a peak brightness of 1900 nits, which is still bright enough for most outdoor scenarios, though it may be less visible under direct sunlight compared to the S24. Both displays offer FHD+ resolution and a 120Hz adaptive refresh rate for smooth scrolling and responsive interactions.
  • Visual Experience: The S24's smaller display has a higher pixel density, resulting in slightly sharper text and images. Both phones deliver vibrant colors and deep blacks characteristic of AMOLED technology.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2340

Screen type

Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X

Dynamic AMOLED 2X

Audiovisual

The camera systems on both the Galaxy S24 and S24 FE are versatile, designed to capture a wide range of photos and videos, with some differences in sensor resolution for specific lenses.

  • Rear Camera Array: Both devices feature a triple-camera setup with a 50-megapixel main sensor and a 12-megapixel ultrawide lens, delivering detailed and vibrant everyday photos. The Galaxy S24 includes a 10-megapixel telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom, while the S24 FE has an 8-megapixel telephoto lens, also with 3x optical zoom.
  • Photography Performance: The S24's camera system is noted for its versatile capabilities, including good low-light performance and accurate colors. The S24 FE's main camera also performs well, capturing quality photos in good lighting conditions, though some users note the ultrawide and telephoto lenses may show slightly less detail compared to the S24.
  • Video and Audio: Both phones are capable of recording high-quality video. Microphone quality for calls and recording is generally clear on both devices. Speaker output provides a good experience for media consumption.

Main camera

50 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

12 megapixels

10 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core performance, several practical elements differentiate the user experience between these two Galaxy smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth v5.3, ensuring modern wireless communication. They both feature a USB Type-C port for charging and data transfer.
  • Biometric Security: The Galaxy S24 incorporates an ultrasonic in-display fingerprint sensor, known for its speed and accuracy. The Galaxy S24 FE uses an optical in-display fingerprint sensor, which is reliable but may be slightly slower in recognition.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy S24 is more compact and lighter, weighing 168 grams, making it easier for one-handed use. The Galaxy S24 FE is larger and heavier at 213 grams, which some users find substantial, though it offers a more expansive screen. The S24 features thinner screen bezels, contributing to its refined appearance.

Weight

167 g

213 g

Width

7,06 cm

7.7 cm

Height

14,7 cm

16.2 cm

Depth

0,76 cm

0.8 cm

Screen size (in)

6.2

6.7

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

User feedback for the Galaxy S24 often highlights its compact size, premium feel, and consistent flagship-level performance, with many appreciating its vibrant display and the promise of seven years of software updates. Some users have noted that the battery life, while good, might require a few days to optimize fully, and some find the device can get warm during intensive tasks. The camera system is generally praised for its versatility, though some wish for stronger low-light performance.

The Galaxy S24 FE is frequently lauded for its larger display and extended battery life, offering a compelling experience for media consumption and prolonged use. Users generally find its performance smooth for everyday activities, and the main camera is well-regarded. Common criticisms include its heavier build, thicker screen bezels, and the optical fingerprint sensor being less responsive than the ultrasonic one found in the S24. Some reports also mention occasional heating under heavy load.

Users prioritizing a more compact device with a premium build, a brighter display, and the fastest possible performance for demanding applications may find the Galaxy S24 better suited to their needs. Conversely, those who value a larger screen for immersive viewing, extended battery life, and are comfortable with a slightly heavier device will likely lean towards the Galaxy S24 FE. Both devices offer a robust Android experience with long-term software support, making them solid choices depending on individual preferences. For those considering an eco-friendly and quality-assured option, exploring refurbished versions of either model can provide an excellent alternative.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons