Galaxy A35 Vs Google Pixel 7A

Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
Starting at

Refurbished price:£119.00

Versus £367.31 new

See options
Google Pixel 7A
Google Pixel 7A
Starting at

Refurbished price:£129.00

Versus £649.99 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Google Pixel 7a are both Android smartphones designed for users seeking a balanced experience in the mid-range segment. The Pixel 7a, released in May 2023, focuses on Google's software integration and camera capabilities, while the Galaxy A35, launched in March 2024, offers a larger display and Samsung's One UI experience. These devices present distinct approaches to core smartphone features, catering to different user priorities.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key differentiators.

  • Software Longevity: The Google Pixel 7a, released in May 2023, is set to receive five years of OS and security updates, extending its support until at least May 2028. The Samsung Galaxy A35, a newer device from March 2024, offers four generations of OS upgrades and five years of security updates, providing a comparable, though slightly different, long-term software commitment.
  • Repairability: The Galaxy A35 has a repairability score of 8.4 out of 10, indicating a design that facilitates easier repairs, with good availability of spare parts and accessible manuals. The Pixel 7a initially scored 4/10 but was later uprated to 5/10 by iFixit after Google released comprehensive service manuals, making DIY repairs more feasible.
  • Physical Durability: Both smartphones feature an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, offering protection against immersion in up to 1 meter of fresh water for 30 minutes. The Pixel 7a uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 for screen protection, while the Galaxy A35 incorporates a metal body for its construction.

Year of Release

2024

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, app usage, and multitasking. Both devices offer capable hardware for their respective segments.

  • Processing Power: The Google Pixel 7a is equipped with a processor designed by Google, which enables smooth navigation and efficient handling of demanding applications, including gaming. The Samsung Galaxy A35 features an in-house processor that provides solid performance for everyday use and can manage gaming sessions without significant performance drops, though some users have reported occasional stutters with heavy multitasking.
  • Multitasking and Storage: The Pixel 7a comes with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, which is not expandable. The Galaxy A35 offers configurations with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, with the added flexibility of expandable storage via a microSD card up to 1TB.
  • Battery Performance: The Galaxy A35 houses a larger 5000mAh battery, generally providing a full day of use for many users, with some reporting up to 7-10 hours of screen-on time with optimized settings. The Pixel 7a has a 4385mAh battery; while initial user reports sometimes noted shorter battery life, adaptive battery features often improve endurance over time, allowing it to last a full day for moderate users.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience is a primary interaction point, and both phones offer vibrant displays with distinct characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Samsung Galaxy A35 features a larger 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display, providing vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Google Pixel 7a has a more compact 6.1-inch OLED display, also known for its rich contrast and color accuracy.
  • Resolution and Refresh Rate: Both devices offer Full HD+ resolutions (2340x1080 for A35, 2400x1080 for Pixel 7a), ensuring sharp and clear visuals. The Galaxy A35 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling and animations, while the Pixel 7a provides a 90Hz refresh rate, which is still a noticeable improvement over standard 60Hz displays.
  • Brightness and Outdoor Visibility: The Super AMOLED panel on the Galaxy A35 delivers a bright and vibrant viewing experience, even under bright conditions, though some users have noted that colors can appear washed out in direct sunlight. The Pixel 7a's OLED display also offers good brightness and clarity for various lighting environments.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2400

Screen type

Super AMOLED

OLED

Audiovisual

Camera capabilities are a significant factor for many users, and both smartphones offer compelling photography and videography features.

  • Rear Camera System: The Galaxy A35 features a triple-camera setup with a 50MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 5MP macro lens. The Pixel 7a comes with a dual-camera system, including a 64MP main sensor with OIS and a 13MP ultrawide lens.
  • Photography Performance: The Pixel 7a is often praised for its computational photography, delivering consistent and detailed images, particularly in various lighting conditions. The Galaxy A35 captures good daylight photos with saturated colors, though some users find its low-light performance to be less consistent, with occasional blurriness and noise.
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: Both devices are capable of recording 4K video at 30 frames per second (fps) with their main cameras, with the Pixel 7a's main camera also supporting 4K at 60fps. For selfies, the Galaxy A35 has a 13MP front camera, while the Pixel 7a features a 13MP ultrawide front camera, both capable of 4K video recording at 30fps.

Main camera

50 megapixels

64 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

13 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core specifications, several other features contribute to the overall user experience and daily practicality of these smartphones.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy A35 and Pixel 7a support 5G connectivity for faster mobile data speeds. They both utilize a USB Type-C port for charging and data transfer, but neither includes a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack. The Pixel 7a supports Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3, while the Galaxy A35 supports Wi-Fi and Bluetooth.
  • Biometrics and Security: The Galaxy A35 includes an in-display fingerprint sensor and features Samsung Knox Vault for enhanced security of sensitive data. The Pixel 7a also offers an in-display fingerprint sensor and face unlock, though some users have reported inconsistencies with the fingerprint sensor.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A35 has a larger form factor, weighing 209 grams and measuring 161.70 x 78.00 x 8.20mm. The Pixel 7a is more compact and lighter at 193.5 grams, with dimensions of 152.4 x 72.9 x 9.0mm, which some users find more comfortable for one-handed use.

Weight

209 g

193 g

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.1

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Choosing between the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Google Pixel 7a depends largely on individual preferences and usage patterns. Users prioritizing a larger, smoother display with expandable storage and Samsung's One UI experience may find the Galaxy A35 well-suited to their needs. Its robust battery life and strong repairability score also contribute to its appeal for those seeking a durable and long-lasting device.

Conversely, users who value Google's clean Android experience, advanced computational photography, and a more compact form factor might lean towards the Pixel 7a. Its consistent camera performance and guaranteed long-term software support are significant advantages. However, potential buyers should consider user feedback regarding initial battery performance and fingerprint sensor consistency.

Both devices offer compelling features within the mid-range smartphone market. For those looking to make an informed and sustainable choice, considering quality-assured refurbished options for either model can provide an eco-friendly alternative, extending the life cycle of these electronic products.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons