Galaxy A25 Vs Galaxy A35

Galaxy A25
Galaxy A25
Starting at

Refurbished price:£121.00

Versus £272.58 new

See options
Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
Starting at

Refurbished price:£119.00

Versus £367.31 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A25 (released in December 2023) and the Samsung Galaxy A35 (released in March 2024) are both mid-range Android smartphones from Samsung's popular A-series. While they share a similar design philosophy and operate on the same Android platform, the Galaxy A35 introduces enhancements in its build materials, processing power, and camera capabilities, setting it apart from its slightly older counterpart. Both devices aim to provide a balanced smartphone experience for everyday users.

Scores

Durability

The practical lifespan of a smartphone is significantly influenced by its release timeline, software support, and physical durability. Both the Galaxy A25 and A35 offer a commendable commitment to software longevity, ensuring users receive updates for an extended period.

  • Software Support: Both the Galaxy A25 and A35 are slated to receive four major Android OS upgrades and five years of security updates from their respective release dates. This means the Galaxy A35, being released a few months later, will benefit from an additional period of software support compared to the A25.
  • Build Materials: The Galaxy A25 features a Gorilla Glass 5 front display, while the Galaxy A35 upgrades to Gorilla Glass Victus+ on the front, offering enhanced resistance against scratches and drops. The A35 also incorporates a glass back, providing a more robust feel compared to the A25's plastic back.
  • Repairability: Both models demonstrate a focus on repairability. The Galaxy A25 has a repairability score of 8.4 out of 10, and the Galaxy A35 also scores 8.4 out of 10, indicating that replacement parts are generally available for an extended duration and that repairs are feasible.

Year of Release

2023

2024

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

Performance in daily use is a key consideration for any smartphone, encompassing how smoothly applications run, how efficiently the battery manages power, and the overall responsiveness of the system.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A25 is equipped with a processor that handles everyday tasks and moderate multitasking effectively. The Galaxy A35 features a newer generation processor, which provides a noticeable improvement in overall speed and responsiveness, particularly for more demanding applications and mobile gaming.
  • Battery Behavior: Both devices house a 5000mAh battery, designed to provide ample power for a full day of typical usage. User experiences suggest that with moderate use, both phones can comfortably last through the day, though heavy usage, especially with 5G and high refresh rates, may require more frequent charging.
  • Storage and Multitasking: Both models offer configurations with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, with support for expandable storage via a microSD card. The higher RAM options on both devices contribute to smoother multitasking and app management.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

6 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for smartphone interaction, and both the Galaxy A25 and A35 offer vibrant viewing experiences with slight differences in size and protection.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: Both smartphones feature Super AMOLED displays with Full HD+ resolution (1080 x 2340 pixels), delivering rich colors and deep blacks. The clarity is consistent across both models, providing a sharp viewing experience for media consumption and general browsing.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: Both devices offer a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and animations, along with a peak brightness of 1000 nits in High Brightness Mode (HBM), ensuring good outdoor visibility.
  • Screen Size and Protection: The Galaxy A25 has a 6.5-inch display protected by Gorilla Glass 5. The Galaxy A35 features a slightly larger 6.6-inch display, which benefits from the more advanced Gorilla Glass Victus+ for enhanced durability.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2340

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Super AMOLED

Audiovisual

The camera systems on both the Galaxy A25 and A35 are designed to capture a range of moments, with some distinctions in their secondary lenses and overall image processing.

  • Main Camera Performance: Both phones are equipped with a 50-megapixel main camera featuring Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), which aids in capturing clear photos and stable videos, especially in varied lighting conditions. The A35's main sensor is noted to be slightly larger, potentially offering improved light gathering capabilities.
  • Ultra-wide and Macro Lenses: Both devices include an 8-megapixel ultra-wide camera for expansive shots. For close-up photography, the Galaxy A25 features a 2-megapixel macro lens, while the Galaxy A35 upgrades to a 5-megapixel macro lens, allowing for more detailed close-up images.
  • Video and Audio Quality: Both models support 4K video recording at 30 frames per second. The Galaxy A35 is noted for its improved image signal processing, which can lead to better low-light photos. Both phones feature stereo speakers, providing a more immersive audio experience for media consumption.

Main camera

50 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

13 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical features contribute to the overall user experience, including connectivity, physical design, and additional functionalities.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both the Galaxy A25 and A35 support 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Bluetooth 5.3. They both utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer. A notable difference is the presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack on the Galaxy A25, which is absent on the Galaxy A35.
  • Physical Design and Durability: The Galaxy A25 has dimensions of 161 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm and weighs 197g. The Galaxy A35 is slightly larger and heavier at 161.7 x 78.0 x 8.2 mm and 209g. The A35 also boasts an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, a feature not explicitly listed for the A25.
  • Security and Sensors: Both smartphones include a side-mounted fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. They also feature NFC for contactless payments and a range of standard sensors like an accelerometer and gyroscope.

Weight

197 g

209 g

Screen size (in)

6.5

6.6

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

User feedback for the Galaxy A25 often highlights its vibrant AMOLED display, reliable battery life for typical use, the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and its commitment to software updates as strong points. Some users have noted that its performance can be adequate for daily tasks but may show limitations with more demanding applications, and low-light camera performance receives mixed reviews.

The Galaxy A35 generally receives praise for its smoother overall performance, enhanced build quality with a glass back and Gorilla Glass Victus+ front, and its capable main camera. Criticisms sometimes point to occasional software stutters, outdoor display colors appearing somewhat washed out in direct sunlight, and low-light photography not always meeting expectations. The absence of a headphone jack is also a point of consideration for some users.

Users prioritizing a slightly more compact device with a headphone jack and solid core features for everyday communication and media consumption may find the Galaxy A25 well-suited to their needs. It offers a balanced experience for those who value these specific aspects. Conversely, individuals who prioritize a more robust build with better screen protection, a slightly larger display, and a more capable processor for smoother performance in heavier applications and gaming might lean towards the Galaxy A35. Its improved macro camera also appeals to those interested in detailed close-up photography. Both devices represent quality-assured refurbished options, providing an eco-friendly alternative for consumers seeking reliable technology.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons