Galaxy A35 Vs Galaxy S24 FE

Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
Starting at

Refurbished price:£119.00

Versus £367.31 new

See options
Galaxy S24 FE
Galaxy S24 FE
Starting at

Refurbished price:£256.00

Versus £741.91 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE are two Android smartphones from different segments of Samsung's lineup, released in March 2024 and October 2024, respectively. While both devices offer a comprehensive smartphone experience running on the Android operating system with Samsung's One UI, they cater to different user priorities. The Galaxy S24 FE distinguishes itself with a more powerful processor, an enhanced camera system, and extended software support, whereas the Galaxy A35 focuses on delivering a balanced experience for everyday use.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of a smartphone, software support and physical resilience are key factors. The Galaxy S24 FE, released in October 2024, benefits from Samsung's commitment to providing seven generations of Android operating system upgrades and seven years of security updates. This extended support ensures the device remains current with the latest features and security protocols for a significantly longer period. The Galaxy A35, launched in March 2024, is slated to receive four years of OS updates and five years of security updates, offering a solid, though shorter, lifespan for software longevity. [4, 7, 16, 35, 44]

  • Software Longevity: The Galaxy S24 FE offers a longer software lifespan with seven years of updates, compared to the Galaxy A35's five years of security updates and four OS upgrades. [4, 7, 16, 35, 44]
  • Physical Durability: Both devices feature robust construction. The Galaxy S24 FE comes with an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance, allowing submersion in up to 1.5 meters of water for 30 minutes. The Galaxy A35 has an IP67 rating, protecting against submersion in up to 1 meter of water for the same duration. The Galaxy A35 also features Gorilla Glass Victus+ on its front for enhanced screen protection. [1, 5, 7, 21, 43]
  • Expected Lifespan: Users prioritizing the absolute longest software support and slightly superior water resistance will find the Galaxy S24 FE better suited, while the Galaxy A35 still provides a substantial and practical lifespan for most users.

Year of Release

2024

2024

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance capabilities of these two devices reflect their different positioning within Samsung's smartphone range, impacting how smoothly they handle various tasks and applications.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy S24 FE is equipped with a more advanced processor, designed to handle demanding applications, intensive multitasking, and graphic-heavy games with greater efficiency and responsiveness. Users report that it maintains smooth operation even under significant load. [12, 17, 21, 31] In contrast, the Galaxy A35, while capable for daily tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, may exhibit occasional stutters or slower loading times when running more resource-intensive applications or during heavy multitasking. [1, 13, 20, 32, 36]
  • Storage and Responsiveness: Both models offer configurations with 8GB of RAM, contributing to competent multitasking. The Galaxy A35 supports expandable storage via a microSD card, offering flexibility for users who need to store large amounts of data. The Galaxy S24 FE typically offers higher base internal storage options, but without microSD expansion. [6, 9, 15, 25, 37, 43]
  • Battery Behavior: The Galaxy A35 features a larger 5000mAh battery, often providing up to 1.5 days of use with moderate activity and easily lasting a full day for most users. [1, 2, 7, 8] The Galaxy S24 FE, with its 4700mAh battery, also delivers excellent battery life, frequently lasting a full day and into the next, partly due to its efficient processor and adaptive display technology. [3, 10, 12, 14, 21, 23]

Memory (GB)

6 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

Both the Galaxy A35 and Galaxy S24 FE feature vibrant AMOLED displays, but there are distinctions in their brightness, refresh rate implementation, and overall viewing experience.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: Both phones utilize Super AMOLED panels, known for their deep blacks and vivid colors, offering a clear and engaging visual experience for media consumption and daily use. Both displays also feature a 1080x2340 (FHD+) resolution, ensuring sharp images and text. [6, 20, 21, 25, 37, 38]
  • Brightness and Outdoor Visibility: The Galaxy S24 FE offers a higher peak brightness of 1900 nits, which significantly enhances visibility in bright outdoor conditions or direct sunlight. The Galaxy A35 reaches a peak brightness of 1000 nits, which is generally sufficient for most indoor and outdoor scenarios, though it may be less comfortable to view under intense sunlight. [21, 37, 42]
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: Both devices feature a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and more fluid animations. However, the Galaxy S24 FE's display includes an adaptive refresh rate, which can dynamically adjust based on content to optimize battery consumption. The Galaxy A35's 120Hz refresh rate is not adaptive, meaning it will consistently operate at 120Hz when enabled, potentially consuming more power. [5, 20, 21, 25, 38]

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2340

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Dynamic AMOLED 2X

Audiovisual

The camera systems on the Galaxy A35 and Galaxy S24 FE offer different strengths, particularly in their versatility and specialized lenses.

  • Rear Camera System: Both phones feature a 50MP main camera with optical image stabilization (OIS), capable of capturing detailed and vibrant photos in good lighting conditions. [1, 2, 6, 12, 14, 20, 27, 28, 31, 33, 38] The Galaxy S24 FE further includes a 12MP ultrawide lens and a notable 8MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom and OIS, providing greater flexibility for capturing distant subjects without significant loss of quality. [5, 12, 14, 27, 28, 31, 33, 37, 38] The Galaxy A35, on the other hand, has an 8MP ultrawide lens and a 5MP macro lens, which some users find less practical for everyday photography compared to a telephoto option. [1, 6, 13, 18, 20, 33]
  • Photography Performance: The main cameras on both devices perform well in daylight, producing images with good dynamic range and color. The Galaxy S24 FE's telephoto lens is a distinct advantage for zoom photography. In low-light conditions, the Galaxy S24 FE generally offers more consistent results, though some users note color inconsistencies. The Galaxy A35's low-light performance can be less impressive, with potential for blurriness and noise. [1, 13, 14, 18, 22]
  • Video Recording and Audio: The Galaxy S24 FE supports up to 8K video recording at 30fps and 4K at 60fps, offering higher resolution and smoother footage. The Galaxy A35 records up to 4K at 30fps. [15, 31, 33] Both devices provide a good audio experience for calls and media consumption, with the S24 FE often praised for its hybrid stereo speakers. [1, 17, 32]

Main camera

50 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

10 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements differentiate the user experience of the Galaxy A35 and Galaxy S24 FE.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both smartphones support 5G connectivity, ensuring fast mobile data speeds. They also include modern Wi-Fi standards and Bluetooth for wireless connections. Both devices feature a USB Type-C port for charging and data transfer. [5, 6]
  • Charging Capabilities: A notable difference lies in charging. The Galaxy S24 FE supports 25W wired fast charging, 15W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging, offering versatile power options. [3, 12, 14, 21] The Galaxy A35 supports 25W wired charging but lacks wireless charging capabilities. [7, 11]
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy S24 FE features an aluminum frame with glass on both the front and back, contributing to a more premium feel. The Galaxy A35 has a plastic frame and back, with a Gorilla Glass Victus+ front. Both devices have similar dimensions and weight, with the S24 FE being slightly heavier at 213g compared to the A35's 209g. User feedback indicates that both can feel substantial in hand, with some noting the bezels on both models. [1, 5, 6, 12, 17, 21, 30, 32]

Weight

209 g

213 g

Width

78 cm

7.7 cm

Height

161,7 cm

16.2 cm

Depth

8,2 cm

0.8 cm

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.7

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

The Samsung Galaxy A35 and Galaxy S24 FE each present a compelling package, tailored to different user needs and expectations. The Galaxy S24 FE is frequently praised by users for its robust performance, excellent battery life, and the inclusion of a versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens. [12, 14, 17, 19, 24, 28] Its extended software support is a significant advantage for those who plan to keep their device for many years. Some users, however, have noted its weight and the size of its bezels. [17, 30]

The Galaxy A35 is generally well-regarded for its vibrant display, impressive battery longevity, and capable main camera, especially for its segment. [1, 2, 8, 20, 36, 39] Criticisms sometimes point to its less powerful processor, which can lead to occasional interface lag, and the perceived limited utility of its macro camera. [1, 13, 18, 20, 32] Both devices offer a solid Android experience with Samsung's One UI.

Users prioritizing long-term software updates, superior processing power for demanding applications, and a more versatile camera with optical zoom capabilities will find the Galaxy S24 FE to be a strong contender. For individuals seeking a reliable daily driver with excellent battery life, a good display, and a capable main camera for general photography, the Galaxy A35 remains a practical choice. Both models are available as quality-assured refurbished options, providing an eco-friendly alternative for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons