Google Pixel 9 Pro Vs Sony Xperia 5 IV

Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Starting at

Refurbished price:£395.25

Versus £917.17 new

See options
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Sony Xperia 5 IV
Starting at

Refurbished price:£299.00

Versus £1,199.00 new

See options

Ratings

The Google Pixel 9 Pro (2024) and the Sony Xperia 5 IV (2022) represent two different philosophies within the smartphone market. While the Pixel 9 Pro is a modern flagship focused on software intelligence and long-term reliability, the Xperia 5 IV is a compact, media-centric device that retains features often removed from newer models. Both run the Android operating system, but the Pixel 9 Pro offers a more current software experience with a significantly longer support window. This comparison explores how these two devices handle daily tasks, media, and longevity for users evaluating their next smartphone.

Scores

Durability

The two devices differ significantly in their expected lifespans due to their release dates and manufacturer support policies.

  • Software Longevity and Support: The Google Pixel 9 Pro is designed for an exceptionally long life, with a commitment to seven years of operating system and security updates. This ensures the device remains secure and compatible with new apps until 2031. In contrast, the Sony Xperia 5 IV was released with a much shorter support commitment, typically receiving only two years of major updates. This means the Xperia is already nearing the end of its official software life, which may impact its long-term utility for users who prioritise the latest security features.
  • Build Quality and Repairability: Both smartphones feature robust glass and metal constructions with high water resistance ratings. However, the Pixel 9 Pro benefits from a more established network for repairs and parts availability. Choosing a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can further extend its practical lifespan while supporting environmental sustainability.

Year of Release

2024

2022

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

No

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

While both smartphones handle daily tasks with ease, their internal hardware reflects different priorities in terms of multitasking and long-term responsiveness.

  • System Responsiveness and Multitasking: The Pixel 9 Pro is equipped with a high amount of internal memory, allowing it to keep numerous apps open in the background without slowing down. This makes it particularly well-suited for users who switch frequently between demanding tasks. The Xperia 5 IV remains responsive for standard browsing and social media, but with less memory and an older architecture, it may struggle more with the most intensive modern applications or heavy multitasking compared to the newer Pixel.
  • Battery Behaviour and Thermal Management: Both devices are capable of lasting through a full day of typical use. The Pixel 9 Pro manages power efficiently during complex tasks, whereas the Xperia 5 IV has been noted by some users to generate noticeable heat during prolonged gaming or video recording. This heat can sometimes lead the system to slow down slightly to protect the hardware, a factor for heavy users to consider when choosing a device for intensive activities.

Memory (GB)

16 GB

8 GB

Screen quality

The viewing experience on these two devices is shaped by different display technologies and physical dimensions.

  • Display Technology and Outdoor Visibility: The Pixel 9 Pro features an advanced OLED display that can vary its refresh rate to provide smooth motion while saving power. It also achieves very high brightness levels, ensuring the screen remains clear and readable even under bright sunlight. The Xperia 5 IV also uses a high-quality OLED panel with excellent colour reproduction, but it does not reach the same peak brightness, which may make it slightly harder to see in direct light.
  • Form Factor and Viewing Experience: Sony uses a distinct 21:9 aspect ratio, creating a tall and narrow screen that is perfect for watching films without black bars. The Pixel 9 Pro uses a more standard, wider aspect ratio that provides more horizontal space for reading emails and browsing the web. The Pixel's screen is also larger overall, offering a more expansive canvas for media and productivity, which many users find more practical for everyday use.

Resolution

1280 x 2856

1080 x 2520

Screen type

LTPO OLED

OLED

Audiovisual

Photography and media consumption are central to both devices, though they approach these features with different philosophies.

  • Camera Systems and Image Processing: The Pixel 9 Pro is known for its computational photography, using software to produce detailed, well-balanced photos in almost any lighting condition. It includes a dedicated telephoto lens for high-quality zoomed shots. The Xperia 5 IV takes a more traditional approach, offering natural colours and a suite of manual controls that appeal to photography enthusiasts who want to adjust settings like shutter speed themselves. Its triple-lens system is versatile but relies less on automated software enhancements.
  • Audio Output and Media Features: The Xperia 5 IV is one of the few devices to retain a physical headphone jack, making it a favourite for those who prefer wired audio. It also features front-facing speakers that direct sound toward the user. The Pixel 9 Pro lacks a headphone jack, requiring wireless headphones or an adapter, but it delivers clear and loud audio through its integrated speaker system, which is well-suited for video calls and casual media viewing.

Main camera

50 megapixels

12 megapixels

Front camera

42 megapixels

12 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Practical daily usage is influenced by the physical design and connectivity options of each smartphone.

  • Handling and Ergonomics: The Xperia 5 IV is exceptionally narrow and lightweight, making it one of the easiest smartphones to use with one hand. Its compact size is a significant advantage for users who prefer a less bulky device. The Pixel 9 Pro is wider and heavier, offering a more substantial feel that provides stability during use, though it generally requires two hands for comfortable navigation and typing.
  • Connectivity and Storage Flexibility: Both phones support 5G for fast mobile data and include modern features like NFC for contactless payments. A major differentiator is the Xperia's inclusion of a microSD card slot, allowing users to easily and cheaply expand their storage capacity. The Pixel 9 Pro has fixed internal storage, meaning users must choose their capacity carefully at the start, as it cannot be upgraded later with a memory card.

Weight

199 g

172 g

Screen size (in)

6.3

6,1

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

Based on user discussions on forums like Reddit, the Google Pixel 9 Pro is widely praised for its intelligent software features and its ability to take high-quality photos with minimal effort. Many users appreciate the peace of mind that comes with its seven-year update policy. However, some find the device a bit heavy compared to previous generations. The Sony Xperia 5 IV receives significant praise for its compact form factor and the inclusion of features like the headphone jack and expandable storage, which are becoming rare. On the other hand, frequent criticisms involve its shorter software support window and its tendency to run warm during intensive tasks.

In summary, users who prioritise a future-proof device with a powerful, automated camera and the latest software will likely find the Pixel 9 Pro to be the better fit for their needs. Those who prefer a smaller, more pocketable phone with traditional media features like a headphone jack and manual camera controls may lean toward the Xperia 5 IV. For those looking to make a sustainable choice, selecting a refurbished model is an excellent way to access these technologies while reducing environmental impact. Both smartphones offer distinct advantages that cater to different types of mobile users in 2026.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons