Compare models

Galaxy A54 Vs iPhone 17 Pro Max

  • 1-year minimum warranty
  • Free delivery on all items
  • Free 30-day returns
Galaxy A54
Starting at

Refurbished price:£134.00

Versus £451.62 new

See options
iPhone 17 Pro Max
Starting at

Refurbished price:£1,024.00

Versus £1,199.00 new

See options

Differences at a glance

The Samsung Galaxy A54 (2023) and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (2025) represent entirely different tiers and release windows in the smartphone landscape. While the Galaxy A54 serves as a mid-range offering focused on everyday utility, the iPhone 17 Pro Max operates as a high-end flagship equipped with advanced mobile technology. These models run on separate operating systems and target distinctly different user requirements through their hardware and software integration.

Available Models

Colour

Storage (GB)

Scores

Durability

When examining hardware longevity and software support, both devices handle ongoing maintenance differently based on their launch timelines and manufacturer policies.

  • Software Support Duration: The iPhone 17 Pro Max benefits from Apple's extended update lifecycle, while the Galaxy A54 receives several years of security patches and system updates from its release date.
  • Repairability and Build: Both handsets feature sturdy construction materials, with standardized repair paths available through authorized and quality-assured refurbished providers as an eco-friendly alternative.
  • Expected Lifespan: The iPhone 17 Pro Max retains high-tier performance headroom for heavier tasks over time, whereas the Galaxy A54 provides reliable daily functionality for standard tasks across its supported lifecycle.

Year of Release

2023

2025

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

iOS

Foldable

No

No

Performance

System performance and efficiency vary significantly, influencing how each device handles multitasking, storage capacity, and daily power consumption.

  • Storage Configurations: Both devices offer multiple internal storage tiers to accommodate media libraries, applications, and documents without relying heavily on cloud storage.
  • Daily Responsiveness: The iPhone 17 Pro Max handles demanding applications, intensive graphics, and complex multitasking smoothly, while the Galaxy A54 manages everyday browsing, streaming, and standard apps with steady efficiency.
  • Battery Behavior: Battery endurance varies by usage intensity, with both models designed to last through a standard day of mixed use before requiring a recharge.

Screen quality

Display characteristics impact outdoor visibility, media consumption comfort, and overall visual clarity during daily interaction.

  • Display Technology: Both devices utilize vibrant OLED panels that deliver deep contrast levels, sharp details, and rich color reproduction for videos and photos.
  • Brightness and Outdoor Use: The iPhone 17 Pro Max achieves high peak brightness levels for clear visibility in direct sunlight, while the Galaxy A54 maintains comfortable viewing legibility in typical outdoor conditions.
  • Refresh Rate and Fluidity: High refresh rate support on both screens ensures smooth scrolling through web pages, system menus, and supported applications.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

2868x1320

Screen type

Super AMOLED

Super Retina XDR

Audiovisual

Imaging hardware and audio output capabilities shape the multimedia experience for both capturing memories and consuming media content.

  • Camera Systems: The iPhone 17 Pro Max incorporates a versatile multi-lens array with advanced computational photography features, while the Galaxy A54 provides a reliable multi-camera setup suitable for everyday snapshots and landscape shots.
  • Low-Light and Video: The iPhone 17 Pro Max excels in challenging lighting conditions and professional-grade video recording, whereas the Galaxy A54 delivers clear results for casual social sharing and video calls.
  • Audio Output: Built-in stereo speakers on both models offer balanced sound reproduction for hands-free calls, podcasts, and casual video viewing.

Main camera

50 megapixels

48 megapixels

Front camera

32 megapixels

18 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Practical daily usability features, connectivity standards, and physical handling characteristics define the overall user experience.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support modern 5G networks, fast Wi-Fi standards, and Bluetooth pairing, utilizing contemporary charging port standards for power delivery and data transfer.
  • Biometric Security: The iPhone 17 Pro Max relies on facial recognition technology, whereas the Galaxy A54 offers an in-display fingerprint sensor alongside facial recognition options.
  • Physical Design: Dimensions and weight differ between the two models, influencing pocketability and single-handed handling comfort during extended use.

Weight

202 g

233 g

Screen size (in)

6.4

6.9

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

What the community thinks

User feedback from online communities highlights distinct preferences for each device based on everyday requirements. Owners of the Galaxy A54 frequently praise its reliable battery performance, clean display quality, and practical daily utility without unnecessary complexity. On the other hand, users of the iPhone 17 Pro Max emphasize satisfaction with its advanced processing power, robust build quality, and comprehensive camera versatility for demanding media tasks.

Users prioritizing high-end processing power, expansive photography options, and long-term hardware headroom will find the iPhone 17 Pro Max well-suited to their needs. Conversely, users seeking a balanced, straightforward smartphone for essential daily communication, media consumption, and reliable operation will lean toward the Galaxy A54. Exploring quality-assured refurbished options for either model provides an eco-friendly path to obtaining modern technology while reducing electronic waste. Ultimately, the choice depends on matching individual workflow demands and feature priorities with the appropriate device architecture.

Our recent comparisons