Galaxy A36 Vs Motorola Moto G14

Galaxy A36
Galaxy A36
Starting at

Refurbished price:£206.00

Versus £369.00 new

See options
Motorola Moto G14
Motorola Moto G14
See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A36 and the Motorola Moto G14 are both smartphones designed for everyday use, though they target slightly different user expectations and offer distinct feature sets. The Moto G14, released in August 2023, focuses on essential smartphone functionalities with a clean software experience. The Galaxy A36, launched in March 2025, presents a more advanced mid-range option with a focus on display quality, camera capabilities, and extended software support. Both devices operate on the Android platform, but with different user interfaces and update policies.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release timelines and software support policies are key factors.

  • Release Timeline: The Motorola Moto G14 was released in August 2023, making it an older model compared to the Samsung Galaxy A36, which launched in March 2025. This difference in release year directly impacts their expected software longevity.
  • Software Support: The Galaxy A36 is designed to receive up to six major Android OS upgrades and six years of security updates, offering a significantly longer support period. The Moto G14, launching with Android 13, typically receives fewer major OS updates and security patches, which means its software will become outdated sooner.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A36 features Gorilla Glass Victus+ on its front and back, along with an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, indicating a higher level of protection against environmental elements. The Moto G14 has a plastic build with Panda Glass on the front and an IP52 rating, offering basic splash and dust resistance.

Year of Release

2025

2023

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is influenced by its internal components, affecting how smoothly applications run and how efficiently it handles daily tasks.

  • Processing Power: The Galaxy A36 is equipped with a current-generation processor, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, which provides a responsive experience for demanding applications and multitasking. The Moto G14 uses a Unisoc Tiger T616 processor, which is suitable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media, but may show limitations with more intensive applications or gaming.
  • Memory and Storage: The Galaxy A36 offers multiple configurations, including options for 6GB, 8GB, or 12GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, providing more flexibility for users who require greater memory for multitasking or extensive storage for files. The Moto G14 typically comes with 4GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, which is adequate for general use but may be less suitable for heavy multitasking.
  • Battery Endurance: Both devices feature a 5000 mAh battery, suggesting similar potential for extended use on a single charge. However, the Galaxy A36 supports 45W fast charging, allowing for quicker replenishment of the battery compared to the Moto G14's 15W charging capability.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for smartphone interaction, and differences in technology and specifications can significantly impact the visual experience.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Galaxy A36 features a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, offering vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast. The Moto G14 has a 6.5-inch IPS LCD panel with a resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, providing clear visuals but with less contrast and color vibrancy compared to an AMOLED screen.
  • Refresh Rate and Brightness: The Galaxy A36 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and a more fluid user interface, along with a peak brightness of up to 1900 nits, ensuring good visibility even in bright outdoor conditions. The Moto G14 features a standard 60Hz refresh rate, which is sufficient for most tasks, and its brightness levels are suitable for indoor and moderate outdoor use.
  • Screen Protection: The Galaxy A36 incorporates Gorilla Glass Victus+ for enhanced screen durability. The Moto G14 uses Panda Glass for its display protection.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2400

Audiovisual

Camera systems are a significant consideration for many users, and both phones offer different photographic capabilities.

  • Rear Camera Setup: The Galaxy A36 features a versatile triple-camera system on the rear, including a 50MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 5MP macro lens, allowing for a range of photographic styles and improved stability in photos and videos. The Moto G14 comes with a dual-camera setup, featuring a 50MP main sensor and a 2MP macro lens, which is capable of capturing detailed images in good lighting conditions.
  • Front Camera Performance: For selfies and video calls, the Galaxy A36 includes a 12MP front camera with Video HDR capabilities, which can enhance image quality in varied lighting. The Moto G14 is equipped with an 8MP front camera, suitable for standard selfie capture.
  • Video Recording: The Galaxy A36 supports 4K video recording at 30 frames per second, offering higher resolution video capture. The Moto G14 records video at 1080p resolution at 30 frames per second.

Front camera

12

8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical features contribute to the overall user experience and device utility.

  • Connectivity Standards: The Galaxy A36 supports 5G network connectivity and Wi-Fi 6, providing faster mobile data speeds and more efficient wireless internet connections. The Moto G14 supports 4G LTE networks and Wi-Fi 5. Both devices include Bluetooth for wireless accessory connections.
  • Ports and Biometrics: Both phones utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer. The Moto G14 retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is absent on the Galaxy A36. For security, the Galaxy A36 features an in-display fingerprint sensor, while the Moto G14 typically has a side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A36 features a design with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on the front and back and a plastic frame, contributing to a more premium feel and enhanced durability. The Moto G14 has an all-plastic body, which makes it lightweight at 177 grams. The dimensions of the Galaxy A36 are 162.9 x 78.2 x 7.4 mm, while the Moto G14 measures 161.46 x 73.82 x 7.99 mm.

Weight

195 g

177 g

Screen size (in)

6,74

6.5

Mobile network

5G

4G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

The Motorola Moto G14 and Samsung Galaxy A36 cater to different user priorities within the smartphone market. Users generally praise the Moto G14 for its clean Android experience and solid battery life, making it a straightforward option for essential communication and media consumption. Its stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support are often highlighted for enhancing the multimedia experience. Criticisms sometimes point to its 60Hz LCD display and the performance of its processor for more demanding tasks.

The Samsung Galaxy A36, on the other hand, receives positive feedback for its vibrant Super AMOLED 120Hz display, offering a visually engaging experience for content viewing and gaming. Its extended software support and more capable camera system with OIS are also frequently noted as strong advantages. Some users might find its larger size less convenient for one-handed use, and while it offers fast charging, the charger itself may be a separate purchase.

Users prioritizing a longer-lasting device with superior display quality, advanced camera features, and extended software support may find the Galaxy A36 better suited to their needs. Those who prefer a more budget-conscious option for everyday tasks, a clean Android interface, and the convenience of a headphone jack might lean towards the Moto G14. Both devices are available as quality-assured refurbished options, providing an eco-friendly alternative for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons