Galaxy A36 Vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Galaxy A36
Galaxy A36
Starting at

Refurbished price:£206.00

Versus £369.00 new

See options
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Starting at

Refurbished price:£538.00

Versus £1,739.49 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A36, released in March 2025, and the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, launched in September 2024, represent distinct approaches to modern smartphone design and functionality. The Galaxy A36 offers a traditional, flat-screen smartphone experience, focusing on robust features for everyday use. In contrast, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold introduces a foldable design, providing a larger, adaptable display for enhanced productivity and media consumption. These devices cater to different user needs, with the A36 emphasizing reliability in a conventional form factor and the Pixel 9 Pro Fold pushing the boundaries of mobile versatility with its innovative folding screen.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, both offer substantial software support, though with slight differences in duration and update frequency.

  • Software Longevity: The Samsung Galaxy A36 is designed to receive up to six Android operating system upgrades and six years of security patches, ensuring a prolonged period of up-to-date software and security. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, on the other hand, is promised seven years of OS upgrades, providing an even longer window for new features and system enhancements.
  • Build and Materials: The Galaxy A36 features Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both its front and back, offering protection against scratches and drops, complemented by a plastic frame and an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold utilizes Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for its outer display and back, with Ultra Thin Glass protecting its inner foldable screen. It boasts an IPX8 water resistance rating, indicating protection against continuous immersion in water, and features a durable stainless steel hinge with an aluminum alloy cover.
  • Expected Practical Lifespan: Both devices are built for durability and extended use. The Galaxy A36's IP67 rating and Gorilla Glass Victus+ contribute to its resilience in daily scenarios, while the Pixel 9 Pro Fold's advanced hinge design, IPX8 rating, and robust display technologies are engineered to withstand the unique stresses of a foldable form factor over time.

Year of Release

2025

2024

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

Yes

Performance

The performance capabilities of these two smartphones are tailored to their respective categories, influencing how smoothly they handle various tasks.

  • Processing Power: The Samsung Galaxy A36 is equipped with a current-generation processor, which allows it to manage daily applications and multitasking efficiently. Users can expect smooth navigation and responsive performance for common smartphone activities. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold integrates a more advanced processor, designed to handle demanding applications, complex AI tasks, and seamless transitions between its folded and unfolded states.
  • Multitasking and Responsiveness: With its substantial RAM, the Pixel 9 Pro Fold offers considerable headroom for running multiple applications simultaneously and switching between them without noticeable delays. The Galaxy A36, while capable, provides a solid experience for typical multitasking, with some user reports suggesting that models with lower RAM configurations might occasionally exhibit minor sluggishness under heavy load.
  • Storage Options: The Galaxy A36 comes with internal storage options, with some sources indicating it can be expanded via a microSD card, while others suggest the absence of a dedicated slot. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold offers generous internal storage configurations, providing ample space for applications, media, and files without external expansion.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

16 GB

Screen quality

The display experience is a primary differentiator, with the Galaxy A36 offering a premium flat screen and the Pixel 9 Pro Fold providing a versatile dual-screen foldable design.

  • Display Technology and Size: The Samsung Galaxy A36 features a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display, known for its vibrant colors and deep blacks, providing an immersive viewing experience on a single, expansive screen. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold boasts two OLED displays: an 8-inch Super Actua Flex internal foldable display and a 6.3-inch Actua cover display. This allows for a compact phone experience when folded and a tablet-like experience when unfolded.
  • Resolution and Brightness: Both devices offer high-resolution displays for clear and detailed visuals. The Galaxy A36's screen has a Full HD+ resolution and can reach a peak brightness of 1200 nits, ensuring good visibility in various lighting conditions. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold's displays offer even higher peak brightness levels, reaching up to 2700 nits, which enhances outdoor visibility and HDR content viewing on both its internal and external screens.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: The Galaxy A36 features a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smooth scrolling and fluid animations. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold's internal display offers an adaptive refresh rate ranging from 1Hz to 120Hz, optimizing power efficiency while providing a consistently smooth visual experience. Its cover display also supports a 60-120Hz refresh rate.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

2076 x 2152

Audiovisual

Both smartphones offer capable camera systems, but they cater to different photographic priorities and user expectations.

  • Rear Camera System: The Samsung Galaxy A36 is equipped with a triple-camera setup, including a 50-megapixel main sensor, an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 5-megapixel macro lens. This configuration is well-suited for capturing a variety of everyday scenes with good detail. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold also features a triple-camera array on its rear, comprising a 48-megapixel main lens, a 10.5-megapixel ultrawide lens with macro focus, and a 10.8-megapixel telephoto lens offering 5x optical zoom and up to 20x Super Res Zoom.
  • Photography Performance: The Galaxy A36 delivers clear and detailed photos, with users often praising its performance in well-lit conditions. Its main camera is noted for producing vibrant images suitable for social media. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold leverages its advanced processing capabilities to enhance image quality, particularly in areas like low-light performance and computational photography, offering features like Super Res Zoom for distant subjects.
  • Video and Audio Capabilities: The Galaxy A36 supports video recording up to 4K at 30 frames per second, providing good quality for casual video capture. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold also offers 4K video recording at various frame rates, including 60 frames per second, on its rear cameras, along with advanced audio processing for clearer recordings and calls.

Front camera

12

10 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and differentiate these two devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity for fast mobile data. The Galaxy A36 includes Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, along with a USB Type-C port for charging and data transfer. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold offers advanced connectivity options such as Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3, and ultra-wideband (UWB), alongside its USB-C port, providing faster and more efficient wireless communication.
  • Biometric Security: The Galaxy A36 features an optical in-display fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold also incorporates a fingerprint sensor, with some user feedback indicating improvements in its performance over previous models.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A36 has a slim profile and a weight of 195 grams, with a design that includes flat edges and a glass back. The Pixel 9 Pro Fold, despite its dual-screen design, is notably thin when unfolded (5.1mm) and weighs 257 grams, offering a more compact folded form factor compared to its predecessor. Its redesigned hinge allows for a full-flat folding screen.

Weight

195 g

257 g

Screen size (in)

6,74

8.0

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

The Samsung Galaxy A36 and the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold cater to distinct user preferences, each excelling in different areas. The Galaxy A36 is frequently praised by users for its vibrant display, reliable battery life that often lasts a full day of heavy use, and a camera that performs well for everyday photography. Its solid build quality and long-term software support are also common points of appreciation. Some users, however, have noted occasional sluggishness with lower RAM configurations and conflicting information exists regarding the presence of a microSD card slot.

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold receives commendation for its innovative foldable design, offering a significantly larger internal display for multitasking and immersive media. Users appreciate its thinner profile compared to previous foldable generations and the integration of advanced AI features powered by its processor. While its camera system is robust, some feedback suggests that the improvements over its predecessor are incremental rather than revolutionary, and the battery capacity is slightly less than the original Pixel Fold.

Users prioritizing a dependable, conventional smartphone experience with excellent screen quality and extended software support will find the Samsung Galaxy A36 well-suited to their needs. It offers a balanced set of features for daily communication, content consumption, and casual photography. For those who require a highly versatile device that transforms from a compact phone to a large-screen tablet, enabling advanced multitasking and leveraging cutting-edge AI capabilities, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold stands out. Its unique form factor and premium features are ideal for users seeking a more expansive and adaptable mobile computing experience. Both devices, whether new or as quality-assured refurbished options, provide a pathway to informed and sustainable technology choices.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons