Galaxy A36 Vs Google Pixel 7 Pro

Galaxy A36
Galaxy A36
Starting at

Refurbished price:£206.00

Versus £369.00 new

See options
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Google Pixel 7 Pro
Starting at

Refurbished price:£169.75

Versus £899.99 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A36, released in March 2025, and the Google Pixel 7 Pro, launched in October 2022, represent distinct approaches to the smartphone experience. While the Galaxy A36 focuses on delivering a balanced mid-range offering with extended software support, the Pixel 7 Pro, a former flagship, emphasizes advanced camera capabilities and a premium build. Both devices operate on the Android platform, but their core strengths and target users differ significantly.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their respective release timelines and software support policies are key factors.

  • Release Timeline: The Samsung Galaxy A36 is a newer device, having been released in March 2025. In contrast, the Google Pixel 7 Pro was launched in October 2022, making it a few years older. This age difference directly impacts their remaining software support.
  • OS Support Duration: The Galaxy A36 offers an impressive commitment of six years of OS upgrades and six years of security updates from its release date, providing a long software lifespan. The Pixel 7 Pro, on the other hand, was promised three years of OS updates (which concluded in October 2025) and five years of security updates (ending in October 2027).
  • Durability Features: Both devices offer good protection against environmental elements. The Galaxy A36 features Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both the front and back, along with an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance. The Pixel 7 Pro comes with Gorilla Glass Victus and an IP68 rating, indicating slightly better water immersion protection.

Year of Release

2025

2022

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily operations, from app usage to demanding tasks.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Galaxy A36 is equipped with a Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 processor, which provides solid performance for everyday activities such as web browsing, social media, and streaming. The Pixel 7 Pro features Google's Tensor G2 processor, designed for more intensive tasks and advanced AI capabilities, offering a higher level of raw processing power for its time.
  • Multitasking and Responsiveness: The Galaxy A36 typically comes with 6GB or 8GB of RAM, with some configurations offering 12GB, allowing for smooth navigation and light multitasking. The Pixel 7 Pro, with its 12GB of RAM, handles numerous applications simultaneously and demanding processes with greater ease.
  • Battery Behavior: Both devices house a 5000mAh battery. The Galaxy A36 is noted for its outstanding battery life, often lasting a full day or more with moderate to heavy use. The Pixel 7 Pro's battery life is generally good, though its higher-resolution display and powerful processor can lead to faster drain under heavy use.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

12 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience is a primary interaction point, and both phones offer distinct display characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Resolution: The Galaxy A36 features a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with an FHD+ resolution (1080 x 2340 pixels), providing vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Pixel 7 Pro also has a 6.7-inch display, but it uses an LTPO OLED panel with a higher QHD+ resolution (3120 x 1440 pixels), resulting in a sharper image.
  • Brightness and Clarity: The Galaxy A36 can reach a peak brightness of 1200 nits, with up to 1900 nits for HDR content, ensuring good visibility in various lighting conditions. The Pixel 7 Pro offers a peak brightness of up to 1500 nits, with some reports indicating up to 1600 nits for short bursts, contributing to clear outdoor viewing, though some users find it challenging in direct sunlight.
  • Refresh Rate and Smoothness: Both smartphones feature a 120Hz refresh rate, which contributes to smooth scrolling and fluid animations. The Pixel 7 Pro's LTPO technology allows for an adaptive refresh rate, scaling from 10Hz to 120Hz to optimize power consumption.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1440 x 3120

Audiovisual

For many users, the camera system is a deciding factor, and these devices offer different photographic strengths.

  • Rear Camera Systems: The Galaxy A36 includes a triple camera setup with a 50MP main sensor (with optical image stabilization), an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 5MP macro lens. The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a more versatile triple camera system, featuring a 50MP main sensor (with OIS), a 12MP ultrawide lens with autofocus, and a 48MP telephoto lens capable of 5x optical zoom and up to 30x Super Res Zoom.
  • Photography Performance: The Galaxy A36's main camera delivers good photos in well-lit conditions, though colors can sometimes appear oversaturated. Its ultrawide and macro lenses are generally considered less capable. The Pixel 7 Pro is renowned for its exceptional still photography, particularly its computational photography which excels in dynamic range, HDR, and low-light performance, often outperforming other devices in challenging conditions.
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: Both phones support 4K video recording at 30fps. The Galaxy A36 can also record 1080p at 60fps. The Pixel 7 Pro supports 4K 60fps video capture across all its rear cameras and offers 10-bit HDR video. For selfies, the Galaxy A36 has a 12MP front camera, while the Pixel 7 Pro features a 10.8MP front camera.

Front camera

12

10.8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity and modern Wi-Fi standards. The Galaxy A36 includes USB-C, while the Pixel 7 Pro features USB-C 3.2 Gen 2, offering faster data transfer speeds. Neither phone includes a traditional headphone jack.
  • Biometrics and Sensors: Both smartphones incorporate an in-display optical fingerprint sensor for secure unlocking. The Pixel 7 Pro also offers 2D face unlock, a convenient feature for quick access.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A36 has a plastic frame and back with a glass front, weighing 195g and measuring 162.9 x 78.2 x 7.4 mm. The Pixel 7 Pro features a more premium glass back and aluminum frame, weighing 212g and measuring 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm. The Pixel 7 Pro's curved display edges can be a point of preference for users.

Weight

195 g

212 g

Screen size (in)

6,74

6.7

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy A36 and Google Pixel 7 Pro cater to different user priorities, reflecting their respective market positions and release timelines. User feedback for the Galaxy A36 often praises its strong battery life, bright display, and Samsung's commitment to long-term software updates. Some criticisms include its performance not being suited for heavy gaming and the quality of its secondary cameras.

The Pixel 7 Pro is frequently lauded for its exceptional still camera performance, particularly in challenging lighting, and its clean Android experience with useful smart features. Common concerns among users have included its battery life under demanding conditions, potential for overheating during intensive tasks, and video recording quality not matching its still photography prowess.

Users prioritizing extended software longevity and a reliable, well-rounded device for everyday tasks and media consumption may find the newer Galaxy A36 well-suited to their needs. Its robust update policy ensures it remains current for a significant period. Conversely, individuals who place a premium on advanced computational photography, a higher-resolution display, and a more flagship-tier performance (for its generation) might lean towards the Pixel 7 Pro. It remains a strong contender for photography enthusiasts, even as an eco-friendly, quality-assured refurbished option. Both devices offer distinct advantages, making the choice dependent on individual usage patterns and feature preferences.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons