Galaxy A35 Vs Motorola Moto G14

Galaxy A35
Galaxy A35
Starting at

Refurbished price:£119.00

Versus £367.31 new

See options
Motorola Moto G14
Motorola Moto G14
Starting at

Refurbished price:£91.24

Versus £139.99 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A35 (released March 2024) and the Motorola Moto G14 (released August 2023) are both Android smartphones designed to offer a balanced experience for everyday users. While both devices run on the Android operating system, the Galaxy A35 distinguishes itself with a more advanced display and longer software support, whereas the Moto G14 focuses on essential features and a clean software experience.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, several factors related to their release and support timelines come into play.

  • Release Timeline and Age: The Samsung Galaxy A35 was released in March 2024, making it a newer device compared to the Motorola Moto G14, which launched in August 2023. This difference in release dates impacts their respective software support cycles.
  • OS Support Duration and Update Frequency: The Galaxy A35 is slated to receive four major Android operating system upgrades and five years of security updates. In contrast, the Moto G14 is guaranteed one OS update, bringing it to Android 14, and three years of bi-monthly security updates. This means the Galaxy A35 offers a significantly longer period of software relevance and security patches.
  • Physical Durability and Protection: The Galaxy A35 features a glass front with Gorilla Glass Victus+ protection and a glass back, along with an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, allowing it to withstand immersion in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes. The Moto G14 comes with a Panda Glass front and a plastic back, offering IP52 splash resistance, which protects against light rain and splashes but not full immersion.

Year of Release

2024

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, from app usage to multitasking and gaming.

  • Processor Capabilities and Responsiveness: The Galaxy A35 is equipped with a more capable processor, which generally translates to smoother app loading, more fluid multitasking, and better handling of demanding applications and games. Users of the Galaxy A35 often report a smooth and fast experience, though some have noted occasional stutters when launching heavier apps. The Moto G14's processor is suitable for essential daily tasks and general use, but users may experience some slowdowns with more intensive applications or extensive multitasking.
  • RAM and Storage Options: The Galaxy A35 is available with 6GB or 8GB of RAM, providing more headroom for running multiple applications simultaneously and enhancing overall system responsiveness. It offers internal storage options of 128GB or 256GB. The Moto G14 typically comes with 4GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage. Both devices support expandable storage via a microSD card, allowing users to increase their storage capacity.
  • Battery Life in Typical Use: Both smartphones are powered by a 5000mAh battery. The Galaxy A35 generally provides good battery life, often lasting a full day or more with moderate usage. Some users, however, report that heavy usage can lead to more frequent charging. The Moto G14 also offers a full day of use, with some users extending to a second day under lighter usage conditions.

Memory (GB)

6 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The display is a primary interface for smartphone interaction, and differences in technology and specifications can significantly impact the viewing experience.

  • Display Technology and Visuals: The Samsung Galaxy A35 features a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display, which is known for producing deep blacks, high contrast, and vibrant colors, offering an immersive viewing experience for media consumption. The Motorola Moto G14 has a 6.5-inch IPS LCD, which provides good color accuracy and wide viewing angles.
  • Resolution and Clarity: Both devices offer Full HD+ resolution. The Galaxy A35 has a resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, while the Moto G14 has a resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. This results in sharp and clear visuals on both screens for everyday use.
  • Brightness and Smoothness: The Galaxy A35's Super AMOLED display can reach higher peak brightness levels, up to 1000 nits, which enhances visibility in bright outdoor conditions. It also boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, providing smoother scrolling and more fluid animations. The Moto G14 has a standard 60Hz refresh rate and a lower typical brightness, which may be less ideal for direct sunlight viewing and offers a less fluid visual experience compared to the A35.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2400

Screen type

Super AMOLED

IPS LCD

Audiovisual

For many users, the camera system is a key consideration, influencing how they capture and share moments.

  • Rear Camera System: The Samsung Galaxy A35 features a versatile triple-camera setup on the rear, including a 50-megapixel main sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), an 8-megapixel ultrawide lens, and a 5-megapixel macro lens. The OIS on the main sensor helps in capturing clearer photos and more stable videos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Motorola Moto G14 comes with a dual-camera system, comprising a 50-megapixel main sensor and a 2-megapixel macro lens.
  • Photography Performance: The Galaxy A35 generally offers better overall photography performance, particularly in low-light scenarios, thanks to its OIS and more capable ultrawide sensor. Its daylight photos are often praised for their quality. The Moto G14's main camera performs well in good lighting conditions, producing decent everyday photos, but it tends to struggle more in low-light environments.
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: The Galaxy A35 supports 4K video recording at 30 frames per second (fps) with both its rear and front cameras, offering higher detail in videos. It also has a 13-megapixel front-facing camera for selfies and video calls. The Moto G14 records videos at 1080p resolution at 30fps and features an 8-megapixel front camera.

Main camera

50 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

13 megapixels

8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core specifications, several practical features contribute to the overall user experience and daily convenience.

  • Connectivity and Network: The Samsung Galaxy A35 supports 5G connectivity, offering faster mobile data speeds and improved network performance in areas with 5G coverage. It also includes Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3 for modern wireless connections. The Motorola Moto G14 is limited to 4G LTE connectivity, which is sufficient for most daily online activities but does not offer the higher speeds of 5G. It supports Wi-Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0.
  • Ports and Biometrics: Both devices feature a USB-C port for charging and data transfer. A notable difference is the presence of a 3.5mm headphone jack on the Moto G14, allowing for traditional wired audio connections. The Galaxy A35 does not include a headphone jack. For security, the Galaxy A35 incorporates an under-display optical fingerprint sensor, while the Moto G14 uses a side-mounted fingerprint sensor. Both also offer face recognition for unlocking.
  • Design and Handling: The Galaxy A35 weighs 209 grams and measures 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm. Some users find it to be a bit heavy and wide, which can affect one-handed use for extended periods. The Moto G14 is lighter at 177 grams and has dimensions of 161.5 x 73.82 x 8 mm, potentially offering a more comfortable grip for some users.

Weight

209 g

177 g

Width

78 cm

7,38 cm

Height

161,7 cm

16,15 cm

Depth

8,2 cm

0,8 cm

Screen size (in)

6.6

6.5

Mobile network

5G

4G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

User feedback for the Samsung Galaxy A35 often highlights its excellent Super AMOLED display, which provides vibrant colors and smooth visuals, and its capable main camera, particularly for daylight photography and video recording with OIS. The promise of extended software support is also a significant praise point, ensuring the device remains current for a longer duration. However, some users have noted occasional performance stutters with demanding applications, slower charging speeds compared to some competitors, and the absence of a traditional headphone jack. Its weight and dimensions are sometimes mentioned as being on the heavier side.

The Motorola Moto G14 receives praise for its solid battery life, often lasting a full day with moderate use, and its clean Android software experience. The inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack is a valued feature for users who prefer wired audio. Criticisms typically revolve around its 60Hz display, which offers less fluidity than higher refresh rate screens, and its processor, which can show limitations with more intensive tasks. Its camera performance in low light is also a frequent concern, and the device is limited to 4G connectivity.

Users prioritizing a vibrant, high-refresh-rate display, longer software longevity, enhanced camera capabilities (especially for ultrawide shots and 4K video), and 5G connectivity will find the Samsung Galaxy A35 well-suited to their needs. Conversely, users who value a traditional headphone jack, a lighter device, a clean Android interface for essential daily tasks, and do not require 5G speeds may lean toward the Motorola Moto G14. Both devices offer a reliable Android experience, and considering a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can be an eco-friendly alternative for consumers.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons