Galaxy A36 Vs Motorola Moto G13

Galaxy A36
Galaxy A36
Starting at

Refurbished price:£197.00

Versus £336.12 new

See options
Motorola Moto G13
Motorola Moto G13
Starting at

Refurbished price:£99.00

Versus £166.76 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A36 and the Motorola Moto G13 are both Android smartphones, but they cater to different user expectations and were released at different times. The Moto G13, launched in January 2023, offers a foundational smartphone experience, while the Galaxy A36, introduced in March 2025, brings more advanced features and a newer operating system. Key differentiators include display technology, processing power, and camera capabilities, reflecting their respective release timelines.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, their release dates and manufacturer support policies are important factors.

  • Release Timeline: The Samsung Galaxy A36 was released in March 2025, making it a significantly newer device compared to the Motorola Moto G13, which launched in January 2023. This difference in release year impacts the duration of software support and the overall practical lifespan of each phone.
  • Software Longevity: The Galaxy A36 is expected to receive up to six major Android operating system upgrades and six years of security patches, offering extended software support. The Moto G13, running on Android 13 at launch, typically receives fewer major OS updates and security patches, suggesting a shorter period of official software support.
  • Durability Features: The Galaxy A36 features Gorilla Glass Victus+ for screen protection and an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, indicating a higher level of protection against environmental elements. The Moto G13 comes with Panda Glass protection and a water-repellent design, which translates to an IP52 rating, offering basic splash resistance.

Year of Release

2025

2023

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily tasks, from app usage to multitasking and gaming. These two devices offer different levels of responsiveness and capability.

  • Processing Power: The Samsung Galaxy A36 is equipped with a more recent processor, which allows for smoother handling of demanding applications and more efficient multitasking. The Motorola Moto G13 uses a processor that provides adequate performance for everyday tasks and light usage, but may show limitations with more intensive applications or complex games.
  • Memory and Storage: The Galaxy A36 is available with various RAM configurations, including 6GB, 8GB, and 12GB, which contributes to its ability to manage multiple apps simultaneously without significant slowdowns. It also offers internal storage options of 128GB and 256GB, though some sources indicate it may not support expandable storage, while others suggest microSD expansion up to 1TB. The Moto G13 typically comes with 4GB of RAM and offers 64GB or 128GB of internal storage, which is expandable via a microSD card up to 512GB.
  • Battery Behavior: Both phones feature a 5000mAh battery capacity, designed to provide a full day of use for most users. The Galaxy A36 supports faster charging speeds of up to 45W, allowing for quicker recharges, although the charger is sold separately. The Moto G13 supports 10W or 20W charging, meaning it will take longer to fully charge.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience is a significant aspect of smartphone use, and these devices offer distinct display technologies and characteristics.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Samsung Galaxy A36 features a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution (2340x1080 pixels), providing vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent contrast. The Motorola Moto G13 has a 6.5-inch IPS LCD display with an HD+ resolution (1600x720 pixels), which offers clear visuals for general use but does not match the color depth or sharpness of an AMOLED panel.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The Galaxy A36's display can reach a peak brightness of 1200 nits (up to 1900 nits for HDR content), ensuring good readability even in bright outdoor conditions. It also boasts a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and animations. The Moto G13 has a peak brightness of around 400 nits, which may be less visible under direct sunlight, and a 90Hz refresh rate, offering a smoother experience than standard 60Hz displays.
  • Screen Protection: The Galaxy A36 is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus+, offering enhanced resistance against scratches and drops. The Moto G13 uses Panda Glass for screen protection.

Resolution

1080x2340

720 x 1600

Audiovisual

For users who prioritize photography and video, the camera systems on these smartphones present different capabilities and features.

  • Rear Camera System: The Samsung Galaxy A36 features a versatile triple-camera setup, including a 50MP main sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 5MP macro lens. This configuration allows for detailed photos, wider landscape shots, and close-up photography, with OIS contributing to clearer images in various conditions. The Motorola Moto G13 also has a triple-camera system, comprising a 50MP main sensor with PDAF (Phase Detection Autofocus), a 2MP macro lens, and a 2MP depth sensor. Its main camera performs well in good lighting, but the supplementary lenses are more basic.
  • Low-Light and Video Performance: The Galaxy A36's main camera, especially with OIS, tends to produce better results in challenging lighting conditions and offers video recording up to 4K resolution at 30 frames per second. The Moto G13 captures 1080p video at 30 frames per second from both its rear and front cameras, and its low-light photography is generally considered average.
  • Front Camera and Audio: The Galaxy A36 is equipped with a 12MP front-facing camera capable of 4K video recording, suitable for detailed selfies and video calls. The Moto G13 has an 8MP front camera that delivers decent selfies in adequate lighting and records 1080p video. Both devices feature stereo speakers, with the Moto G13 specifically mentioning Dolby Atmos support for an enhanced audio experience.

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience and daily convenience.

  • Connectivity and Ports: The Samsung Galaxy A36 supports 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi 6, and Bluetooth 5.4, offering faster network speeds and more efficient wireless connections. It features a USB-C 2.0 port. The Motorola Moto G13 supports 4G LTE, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac), and Bluetooth 5.1. It also includes a USB-C 2.0 port and retains a 3.5mm headphone jack, which is absent on the Galaxy A36.
  • Biometric Security: The Galaxy A36 incorporates an optical fingerprint sensor embedded within its display, along with face recognition for unlocking. The Moto G13 features a side-mounted fingerprint sensor, typically integrated into the power button, and also supports face unlock.
  • Design and Build: The Galaxy A36 has dimensions of 162.9 x 78.2 x 7.4 mm and weighs 195g, featuring a glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+) and a plastic frame and back. It boasts an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance. The Moto G13 measures 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm and weighs around 183.5g, with a plastic build and Panda Glass on the front. It has a water-repellent design with an IP52 rating.

Weight

195 g

183 g

Screen size (in)

6.7

6.5

Mobile network

5G

4G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM + eSIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

The Samsung Galaxy A36 and Motorola Moto G13 offer distinct experiences, largely influenced by their release dates and target markets. Users often praise the Galaxy A36 for its vibrant AMOLED display, extended software support, and capable main camera with OIS. Some common criticisms include the potential lack of expandable storage in certain configurations and the performance, while solid for everyday use, might not satisfy power users for intensive gaming. The Moto G13 is frequently lauded for its impressive battery life, the inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and its stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos. However, its display resolution and overall camera performance, particularly in low light, are often noted as areas where it falls short compared to more recent devices.

Users prioritizing a modern display, long-term software updates, and enhanced camera features, including 4K video recording and OIS, may find the Samsung Galaxy A36 better suited to their needs. Its 5G connectivity and higher durability rating also make it a compelling choice for those seeking a more future-proof device. Conversely, individuals who value extended battery life, a traditional headphone jack, and expandable storage for media, and who primarily engage in lighter smartphone use, might lean towards the Motorola Moto G13. It provides a reliable experience for essential functions and media consumption. Both devices, when considered as quality-assured refurbished options, present eco-friendly alternatives for consumers looking to make informed and sustainable choices.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons