Galaxy A54 Vs Motorola Moto G14

Galaxy A54
Galaxy A54
Starting at

Refurbished price:£119.00

Versus £499.00 new

See options
Motorola Moto G14
Motorola Moto G14
Starting at

Refurbished price:£91.24

Versus £139.99 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A54 and the Motorola Moto G14 are both Android smartphones released in 2023, targeting different segments of the market. The Galaxy A54, launched in March 2023, positions itself with a focus on a vibrant display, enhanced camera capabilities, and extended software support. The Moto G14, released in August 2023, emphasizes core functionality and a balanced user experience for everyday tasks. Both devices operate on the Android platform, offering a familiar interface for users.

Scores

Durability

When considering the longevity of these devices, several factors come into play, including their release timelines, software support, and repairability.

  • Release Timeline and OS Support: The Samsung Galaxy A54, released in March 2023, benefits from Samsung's commitment to providing four major Android OS updates and five years of security patches, extending its software lifespan significantly. The Motorola Moto G14, launched in August 2023, is typically expected to receive one major OS update and three years of bi-monthly security updates.
  • Repairability: The Galaxy A54 has a repairability score ranging from 6.25 to 8.4 out of 10, indicating it is a fairly repairable device, with components like the battery and screen being accessible. The Moto G14, however, has a lower repairability score of 5.0 out of 10, with adhesive used for the back cover and battery making disassembly more challenging.
  • Expected Practical Lifespan: Users prioritizing long-term software updates and potentially easier repairs may find the Galaxy A54 offers a longer practical lifespan, while the Moto G14 provides a more standard update cycle for its category.

Year of Release

2023

2023

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance of a smartphone is crucial for daily usage, encompassing everything from app responsiveness to battery endurance.

  • Processor Capabilities: The Galaxy A54 features a more capable processor designed to handle demanding applications and multitasking smoothly, providing a responsive experience for various tasks including gaming. The Moto G14 is equipped with a processor that performs well for everyday use, such as messaging, browsing, and light applications, though it may exhibit slower responses with more intensive tasks.
  • Battery Behavior: Both devices house a 5000 mAh battery. The Galaxy A54 generally offers good battery life, with users reporting it can last a full day with moderate to heavy usage, and some achieving extended screen-on time on Wi-Fi. The Moto G14 also provides respectable battery endurance, often lasting a full day even with heavy use, and potentially extending into a second day for lighter users.
  • Storage and RAM: The Galaxy A54 is available with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and 128GB or 256GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD. The Moto G14 typically comes with 4GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, also expandable up to 1TB.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

4 GB

Screen quality

The visual experience is a key differentiator, with both devices offering distinct display technologies and features.

  • Display Technology and Resolution: The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a 6.4-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 2340x1080 pixels, delivering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Motorola Moto G14 features a 6.5-inch IPS LCD display with a resolution of 1600x720 pixels, providing clear visuals suitable for general viewing.
  • Refresh Rate and Brightness: The Galaxy A54 offers a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations, and a peak brightness of 1000 nits for good outdoor visibility. The Moto G14 has a standard 60Hz refresh rate, which is adequate for most daily interactions, and its brightness levels are suitable for indoor use.
  • Viewing Experience: Users prioritizing a more fluid and visually rich experience with excellent contrast and brightness, especially outdoors, will find the Galaxy A54's display more appealing. The Moto G14 offers a larger screen size for media consumption, though with less visual fidelity.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1080 x 2400

Screen type

Super AMOLED

IPS LCD

Audiovisual

The camera systems on these smartphones cater to different photography needs and expectations.

  • Rear Camera Capabilities: The Galaxy A54 features a versatile triple-camera setup, including a 50MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 12MP ultrawide lens, and a 5MP macro lens. This configuration allows for detailed photos, wider landscape shots, and close-up photography, with improved low-light performance. The Moto G14 comes with a dual-camera system, primarily a 50MP main sensor and a 2MP macro lens, suitable for capturing everyday moments in good lighting conditions.
  • Video Recording Quality: The Galaxy A54 supports video recording up to 4K at 30 frames per second (fps) with both its rear and front cameras. The Moto G14 records videos at 1080p at 30fps.
  • Front Camera: For selfies and video calls, the Galaxy A54 is equipped with a 32MP front camera, while the Moto G14 has an 8MP front camera.

Main camera

50 megapixels

50 megapixels

Front camera

32 megapixels

8 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond the core features, several practical elements contribute to the overall user experience of these devices.

  • Connectivity and Ports: The Samsung Galaxy A54 supports 5G connectivity, Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Bluetooth v5.3, and NFC. It features a USB-C 2.0 port but lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack. The Motorola Moto G14 offers 4G LTE connectivity, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Bluetooth v5.0, and NFC (region-dependent). It includes a USB-C 2.0 port and retains a 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • Build Materials and Durability: The Galaxy A54 features a premium design with Gorilla Glass 5 on both the front and back, and an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance. The Moto G14 has a plastic body with Panda Glass on the front and an IP52 rating for dust and splash resistance.
  • Dimensions and Weight: The Galaxy A54 weighs 202g and measures 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm. The Moto G14 is lighter at 177g and measures 161.46 x 73.82 x 7.99 mm, offering a slightly more compact and lighter feel.

Weight

202 g

177 g

Screen size (in)

6.4

6.5

Mobile network

5G

4G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Dual Physical SIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C + Jack 3.5mm

User feedback for the Samsung Galaxy A54 often praises its vibrant AMOLED display, reliable camera performance, and Samsung's commitment to long-term software updates. Some users note its capable performance for daily tasks and good battery life. Criticisms sometimes point to the processor not being optimized for intense gaming sessions, and some find the design to be conventional.

The Motorola Moto G14 is frequently commended for its solid battery life, clear display for its category, and the inclusion of stereo speakers and a 3.5mm headphone jack. Users appreciate its balanced performance for everyday use. Common criticisms include its slower charging speed and the limited number of major OS updates compared to some competitors.

For users prioritizing a superior display, a more versatile camera system with better low-light capabilities, and extended software support, the Samsung Galaxy A54 may be the more suitable choice. Its robust build with glass on both sides and higher water resistance also contributes to its appeal for those seeking greater durability. Conversely, individuals who value a more budget-conscious option with dependable battery life, a headphone jack, and sufficient performance for general smartphone use might find the Motorola Moto G14 aligns better with their needs. Both devices offer a practical entry into the Android ecosystem, and choosing a quality-assured refurbished option for either model can be an eco-friendly alternative to purchasing new.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons