Galaxy A26 Vs Google Pixel 9 Pro

Galaxy A26
Galaxy A26
Starting at

Refurbished price:£152.00

Versus £419.55 new

See options
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Starting at

Refurbished price:£395.25

Versus £917.17 new

See options

Ratings

The Samsung Galaxy A26 (released March 2025) and the Google Pixel 9 Pro (released September 2024) represent distinct segments within the smartphone market. While the Galaxy A26 offers a robust mid-range experience, the Pixel 9 Pro delivers a flagship-tier device with advanced computational capabilities. Both smartphones operate on the Android platform, but they cater to different user priorities, particularly concerning performance, camera sophistication, and overall software integration. Both models are also available as quality-assured refurbished options, providing an eco-friendly alternative for consumers.

Scores

Durability

When considering the long-term usability of these devices, both the Galaxy A26 and the Pixel 9 Pro offer substantial software support, a key factor in their practical lifespan.

  • Software Longevity: The Google Pixel 9 Pro stands out with an impressive commitment to software updates, promising seven years of OS and security updates, extending its support until Android 22. The Samsung Galaxy A26 also provides excellent longevity for its class, offering six years of OS and security updates.
  • Physical Durability: The Galaxy A26 features Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both the front and back, coupled with an IP67 rating for water and dust resistance, indicating good protection against everyday elements. The Pixel 9 Pro, as a flagship device, is built with premium materials and features Gorilla Glass Victus 2 for display protection, and carries an IP68 rating for enhanced water and dust resistance.
  • Expected Practical Lifespan: Users can expect both devices to remain functional and secure for many years. The Pixel 9 Pro's longer software commitment and higher-end components suggest a slightly extended peak performance period, while the A26 offers a reliable and durable experience for its segment.

Year of Release

2024

2024

Compatible with latest Update

Yes

Yes

OS

Android

Android

Foldable

No

No

Performance

The performance capabilities of the Galaxy A26 and Pixel 9 Pro reflect their respective market positions, with the Pixel 9 Pro offering a more powerful and responsive experience.

  • Processing Power: The Google Pixel 9 Pro is powered by the Google Tensor G4, designed to handle demanding applications and complex AI tasks with smooth and seamless operation. This translates to quick app loading, fluid multitasking, and efficient processing for advanced features. The Samsung Galaxy A26 utilizes the Exynos 1380 (or 1280 in some regions), which provides efficient performance for daily use and general purposes, including mid-range gaming.
  • Multitasking and Responsiveness: The Pixel 9 Pro, with its 16GB of RAM, offers substantial headroom for extensive multitasking and ensures a highly responsive user interface, even with numerous applications open simultaneously. The Galaxy A26, available with 6GB or 8GB of RAM, handles everyday multitasking well, though some users have reported occasional lag when switching between multiple demanding applications.
  • Storage Options: The Pixel 9 Pro offers a range of storage configurations, including 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, and 1TB, catering to users with extensive storage needs. The Galaxy A26 comes with 128GB or 256GB of UFS 2.2 storage, which is expandable via a microSDXC card, providing flexibility for users who prefer physical storage expansion.

Memory (GB)

8 GB

16 GB

Screen quality

Both smartphones feature vibrant displays, but the Pixel 9 Pro offers a more premium viewing experience with higher resolution and brightness.

  • Display Technology and Clarity: The Google Pixel 9 Pro features a 6.3-inch OLED display with a resolution of 2856 x 1280 pixels, resulting in a sharp pixel density of approximately 495 ppi. This Super Actua display ensures crisp details and vibrant colors. The Samsung Galaxy A26 sports a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display with a Full HD+ resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, offering a pixel density of around 385 ppi.
  • Brightness and Refresh Rate: The Pixel 9 Pro's display boasts a high peak brightness of up to 3000 nits, making it exceptionally visible even in direct sunlight. It also features an LTPO variable refresh rate that dynamically adjusts from 1Hz to 120Hz for smooth scrolling and power efficiency. The Galaxy A26 also offers a smooth 120Hz refresh rate and an average brightness of around 700 nits, which is suitable for most indoor and outdoor conditions, though direct sunlight can make it more challenging to view.
  • Viewing Experience: The Pixel 9 Pro's higher resolution and superior brightness contribute to a more immersive and detailed viewing experience, particularly for high-quality media. The Galaxy A26 provides a large and vibrant display that is well-suited for everyday content consumption and gaming, with slim bezels enhancing the visual area.

Resolution

1080 x 2340

1280 x 2856

Audiovisual

The camera systems on these devices cater to different levels of photographic ambition, with the Pixel 9 Pro offering a more advanced and feature-rich setup.

  • Rear Camera System: The Google Pixel 9 Pro features a versatile triple-camera system, including a 50MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), a 48MP ultrawide lens with autofocus for macro shots, and a 48MP telephoto lens offering 5x optical zoom. This setup is complemented by Google's renowned computational photography. The Samsung Galaxy A26 comes with a triple-camera array consisting of a 50MP main sensor with OIS, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens.
  • Photography Performance: The Pixel 9 Pro excels in various lighting conditions, delivering natural-looking photos with excellent detail and dynamic range, and offers advanced features like Night Sight and Astrophotography. Its Pro Controls allow for greater manual adjustment. The Galaxy A26's main camera performs decently in good lighting, capturing good dynamic range, but users have noted that colors can appear muted and low-light performance could be improved.
  • Video Recording and Front Camera: The Pixel 9 Pro supports 4K video recording and offers advanced video features like Video Boost (for 8K upscaling via cloud) and Cinematic blur. Its 42MP front camera with autofocus captures sharp and detailed selfies, even in lower light. The Galaxy A26 records video at 4K@30fps and features a 13MP front camera that captures excellent selfies with good color accuracy.

Front camera

13 megapixels

42 megapixels

Miscellaneous

Beyond core specifications, several practical elements differentiate the user experience of the Galaxy A26 and Pixel 9 Pro.

  • Connectivity and Ports: Both devices support 5G connectivity for faster mobile data speeds. The Galaxy A26 includes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) and Bluetooth 5.3, along with a USB-C 2.0 port. The Pixel 9 Pro features modern Wi-Fi standards (expected to be Wi-Fi 6E or 7) and Bluetooth, with a USB-C port for charging and data transfer.
  • Biometric Security and Design: The Pixel 9 Pro incorporates an under-display ultrasonic fingerprint sensor for secure and convenient unlocking. The Galaxy A26 uses a side-mounted fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button. In terms of design, the Galaxy A26 has a slim 7.7 mm body with a glass back and an IP67 rating. The Pixel 9 Pro features a refined, premium design with a compact form factor (152.8 x 72 x 8.5 mm) and dual stereo speakers for an enhanced audio experience. The Galaxy A26 has a single bottom-firing speaker and lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack.
  • User Interface and AI Features: The Pixel 9 Pro heavily integrates Google's Gemini-branded artificial intelligence features, offering advanced AI capabilities for various tasks, including camera enhancements and smart assistance. The Galaxy A26 runs on Samsung's One UI 7 over Android 15, providing a customizable and user-friendly interface with some AI-powered editing tools like Object Eraser.

Weight

197 g

199 g

Screen size (in)

6.5

6.3

Mobile network

5G

5G

SIM card

Dual Physical SIM

Physical SIM + eSIM

Carrier compatibility

Unlocked

Unlocked

Connector

USB-C

USB-C

User sentiment for the Google Pixel 9 Pro often highlights its exceptional camera capabilities, with many praising its ability to capture natural and high-quality photos consistently. The vibrant and bright OLED display, along with the smooth 120Hz refresh rate, also receives frequent commendation. Users appreciate the long-term software support and the fluid performance for everyday tasks, though some note that its raw processing power might not match other top-tier flagships. Criticisms occasionally point to the phone getting warm during intensive use or charging, and some users find the default Google apps less feature-rich than Samsung's alternatives.

For the Samsung Galaxy A26, common praise centers on its bright Super AMOLED display and the extended software support for a mid-range device. The main camera is generally considered good for its price point, and the IP67 water and dust resistance is a valued addition. However, some users have reported concerns regarding battery life, with instances of overheating and faster-than-expected drain. The absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack and the presence of a single speaker are also noted as drawbacks by some.

Users prioritizing a premium camera experience, cutting-edge AI features, and the longest possible software support will find the Google Pixel 9 Pro well-suited to their needs. Its high-resolution, bright display and robust performance make it ideal for those who demand a top-tier smartphone. Conversely, users seeking a reliable and durable device for everyday tasks, with a good display and solid software longevity, may prefer the Samsung Galaxy A26. It offers a balanced feature set for general use without the flagship price tag. Both devices, whether new or as a quality-assured refurbished option, provide a pathway to informed and sustainable choices in mobile technology.

See all articles

Our recent comparisons